Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No.
7+22
SECOND DhJ'IB ION Docket No.
73+8
2-SPr-CM-'77
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee James C. McBrearty when award was rendered.
( System Federation No.
162,
Railway Employes'
( Department, A. F. of L. - C. I. 0.
Parties to Dispute: ( (Carmen)
( Southern Pacific Transportation Company
Dispute: Claim of Employes:
1. That the Southern Pacific Transportation Company violated car
inspector E. P. Bodiford's seniority rights in accordance with
Rules
15
and
28
of the Agreement between Southern Pacific
Transportation Company and the Employees Represented by System
Federation No.
162,
when they unjustly restricted Car Inspector
E. P. Bodiford from exercising his seniority rights, effective
January
13, 1975.
2. That accordingly, the Southern Pacific Transportation Company be
ordered to allow Car Inspector E. P. Bodiford to exercise his
seniority without arty restrictions.
Findings:
The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and
all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this
dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the
Railway Labor Act as approved June 21,
193..
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute
involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing thereon.
The record before us indicates that Carrier was unaware that Claimant
was legally blind (20-60 vision)
iri
his~right eye after a cornea transplant
on July
31, 1961.
Carrier subsequently found out that Claimant was legally blind in his
right eye, and on January
13, 1975,
advised Claimant that he would no longer
be allowed to exercise his seniority on vacancies on the Crest or the Yards
in the Englewood Terminals. Further, Carrier advised Claimant that he would
be restricted to being employed in the Shops.
From the record before us, we find that Carrier's requirement of
physical fitness of its employees, including vision in both eyes, is both
reasonable and necessary.
Form 1 Award No. 7+22
Page 2 Docket No. 73+8
2-sgr-CM-' 77
The duties of car inspecting in a large terminal such as Houston require
a carman to be constantly on and near congested yard switching and through
tracks, with cars, single or in drags, and locomotives moving in more than
one direction at the same time. It is a matter of general knowledge in the
industry that cars "kicked" in switching move silently and swiftly, and the
principal safeguard against injury when working around such movements is a
clear, full vision. A taxman with vision from only one eye, in giving
attention to his duties of inspecting or other repair work, would be in
unreasonable peril of injury from other equipment moving about him.
Furthermore, as stated in Second Division Award No. 107+:
" A car inspector's first and foremost duty, and the
primary purpose of car inspection is safety. This entails
careful visual inspection to discover defective conditions,
if any, which render the car or cars unsafe and unserviceable.
Good vision is essential and absolutely necessary to the proper
discharge of the duties of a car inspector. To oblige this
carrier to have employes with impaired vision inspect cars
would b e to invite the possibility of defects, involving safety
of operation, being overlooked or signals being misinterpreted,
resulting in unnecessary train operation hazards, and the
possibility of train accidents involving property damage,
including damage to or destruction of, locomotives and/or
cars. Coupled with this is the even more serious aspect of
increased peril to not only his own life, and that of his
fellow-employes, but the public also."
(Also see Second Division Awards Nos.
363+,
3137, 2988, 2.73, and 1+78).
Therefore, we must deny the claim.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By
Order of Second Division
Attest: Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board
By
ysemarie Brasch - Administrative Assistant
Dated at CChicago, Illinois, this 9th day of December, 1977.