Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD Y0JIISTI',h'~TT BCARD Award No 
. 71'-X31.
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 
732B-T
  
2-SIT-MA,- t 
78
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Herbert Z. Mary:, Jr. when award was rendered.
( International Association of Pachin.ists
(  and Aerospace Workers
Parties to Disl)ute:
( Southern Pacific Transportation CoYn,pwny
Diszrute: Claim of Emnlo~,7cs:
1. That tile Carrier violated hules 
33 (a), 57 
and I,"'-norarldm~: "A" of
the current controlling Aree:aent -rl:en it assign-.d elect 
r4l_C
HOp3.`1.^. and hana';Ti;.y t0 
1?E."_'.lOi, 
n 
~??"O..f'::1 
auxiliary 
~g'=Y?C'x'atOr 1rW'~r:'v
bOlt.^ by d_Y'illf'.i'l~S out and ''C::?.:~p1n`; bolt 
aOIOS IO?' 
nlew mount -bolts
on unit I+308 o}`! 
October 29, 1975 at 5:00 P.M. in `t-,he Rosevilie
Diesel Shops.
2. That, ac:eordinc;l;ye, the Carrier be ordered to pay "v^hinists F.
red aria L. _e_r:eses (here-i-nwvter raferred to as C:L.air~ants ) eac
h
an add.ition.al five 
(5) 
hours ce:rpens~::cion for e1_E::~.'tricia,ns F:;-o:~;_i-s
and 3:a.naww`y porfoxming 
Lachi 
Fists troie.
Findings:
The Second Division of the 
Adjustment Board, 
upon the whole record and
al-l_ the evidence, finds that:
The car ri.er or carriers and the employe or ear, ' ployes involved 
in 
this
dispute are respectively carrier and, e!rploye vit.hin the m-eanv_ng of the
Railway Labor Act as approved Jane 
21_, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute
involved herein.
Parties to said dispute z~raived right of appearance at hearing thereon.
The Organization clairr.s that employes of its craft should have been
assigned to the work described in the Claim, and that the Carrier violated
the Agreement !n ass.Lun_LnJ the work to Electricians.
The record indicates that Electricia!is have performed this wor'_ over
a period of twenty years.
Both the Organization and the International Brotherhood of Electrical
Workers are S1F;Y1a'tOr1eS t0 "i'JlE:IT10';'wndUiiitAt", a ~_e-.iorarad_,uin of Agreement signeed
On April 
17, 
lj~-I-2.Ye;.110rS.Y1d11:ri "At" reads In part:
Form 1    Award No. 
7+81
Page 2   Docket T.?o. 
`T328-T
    
2-ST-T-T~^.A-' 
78
 
" in order to avoid conflastion at the local points
  
and provide an orderly dote rinal 
nation 
of the items of work
  
not specifically stated in Vine 'Classflfilcations of Work'
  
and other Rules of the several crafts, it is agreed that
  
exista.r;F; practices will be covrt~.nued, unless and until
  
other_ -rise decided -by conference and neg o t:`,arsons between
  
the General Cha:ixia7an involved, and the 10,eneral
  
Su pei-:_hJ:endent 
or' 
~.Ioti ve 1ower, far 1mrpose of unifozmally
  
app7_yim_; such decision wherever necessary on the
  
railroads.
. .
,r
The Board finds that this dis;~.zte is typically one calling for discu:,-.~_on
and possible- Y'L',S.`pl:,zt:lOn 1?rider the te5ialS Of 
M2?l:O;CahC1~:=:~1 
"A" "A". The Board finds
farther that such 1:x'oced_uie has not boors 1013.o~;red as yet by the Organization.
Award No. 
721_8, 
anal the several cases, referred. to therein, are in
direct 
pouf; 
to tYv:is dispute.
In tlee 
absence 
of compliance with i.:e:}rorandvm "A", the disp;rte is not
properly before tu: Board for resolution.
A W A 
R Claim dismissed.
T?LT:LCNAT r,:'1ZLI10AD ADJUS"_~'ITEu:'1' BCAT;.T)
 
By Order o% Second Division
Attest:,: hxecutivre Secretary
 
National Railroad AdjustmLent Board
_
~  ~.__...
By ~ _ 
:~ ,..~,~ t'~ .,.,.,-,, 
~, es~ 
C.=, ,~ ~ -^%-_ .._::"~°`" ~
:.=._..~
`-.r:iy·`:.'.r.:aI:'1 
c::~ .3X':.~.SCYl - AC:afiihlS 
t 
:c ~?.t1ve . _,,,ssistant
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 24th day of February, 
1978.