Form I NATIONAL RAI LROAr: AD.n1ST`·-E`7 BOARD Award No. 7487
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 7315-T
2-BN1-Cry-' 78





System Federation No. 7, Railway Employes'
Department, A. F . of L. - C. I. 0.

Dispute: Claim of Fnalflves:

Burlington Northern Inc.





Findings;

The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole reco-:°d and all the ev.'ence, rinds that:

a
The carrier or carriers and the employs or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employs within the meaning of the Railway Labor act as apprc,Yed June 21, 193-*.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.



The Carrier maintains a Train Yard and Repair Trick which employes a number of coach cleaners assigned to clearing cabooses at Alliance, Nebraska, which is part of the former Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad. The petitioning Organization has processed this claim on be-W of the Claimant who is a Coach Cleaner at Alliance. In August of 1975, the Carrier assigned the work in question to employees represented by the International Brotherhood of Fireman and Oilers, ".he petitioning Organization alleges that Coach Cleaners have exclusive rights to this work at Alliance, Nebraska under. the provision of Rule 98(c), inasmuch as they performed the work continuously at that point from the -beginning of pooled cabooses (mid 1957) to the date giving rise to the instant claim, AuEast 5, 1975.
Form I. Page 2

Award :No. 7487
Docket No. 7315-T
2-Bpi-CM-' 78

On March 3, 1970, the Northern Pacific, 3reat Ncr'therm, Chicago, Buxling:oc and quincy and the Spokane, Portland and Seattle Railroads were merged into one Carrier new known as the Burlington Northern inc. Role 98(c), upon which the Organization relies, was negotiated to preserve the practices historically in effect on the former railroads prior to the merger of March 3, 1970. Rule 98(c) states as follows:

"It is the intent of this Agreement to preserve the pre existing rights accruing to employ ees covered by the Agreements as they existed ur,'.er similar rules in effect on the CB and Q, NP, (1N and SP and S Railroads prior try the date of the merger; and shall not operate to extend jurisdiction or Scope Rule coverage to agreements between another organization and one or more of the merging Carries which were in effect prior to the date of merg--."

The matter of applicatioia of Rule 98(c) was the subject of e~:~uensive treatment in Second Division Award No. 6867 (Twomey), involving the same Carrier as in the instant cla~`m and the Sheet Metal Workers, and in Second Division Award No. 7244 (Roadley), involving the same parties that are before us in the instant claim. Those awards found that in order for work to be retained based solely on the provisions of Rule 98(c), the claictng party must show an exclusive system-·wide practice on the former cogent railroad prior to the -merger. Based on the reasoning in tho.~e asmrds .%nd the lack of evidence that the practice at Alliance, Nebraska. w=..z syst-em wide on the former Chicago, Burlington and ~--uincy Railroad, -ie will diamisa the claim.

A W A R D

Claim di ,sassed.

Attest: Executive Secretary


$Y a e~
~r-ie Branch - Administrative Assistant

Dated at Chicago, I11ino's, this 4th day of April, 1978,

NATTOIUAW, RAIIXAD ADJUST BOA-P2

By Order of Second Division