Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 7529
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 7374-T
2-KCT-EW-'78





Parties to Dispute: ( (Electrical Workers)




Dispute: Claim of Employes:







Findings:

The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division, of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.



The record indicates that the claimant was employed by the Carrier as the only electrician in the Mechanical Department at Kansas City, Missouri, at the time of the incident. His hours were 8:00 a.m. to x+:00 p.m. with Saturday and Sunday as rest days. An electrically operated gasoline pump located on the dock of the storehouse, used to service the Carrier's vehicles and equipment was found to be inoperative. A signalman in the area was called to the pump and, upon inspection, found the trouble to be
Form 1 Award No. 7529
Page 2 Docket No. 7374-T
2-KCT-EW-'78

a broken wire on the pump motor; he effected the repair, requiring about five minutes, according to the Carrier.

The Organization contends violation of the Rules governing seniority (19, 20, 21) and Rule 67 establishing "Classification of Work":



The Carrier raises as a defense the contentions that such work is not exclusively reserved for electricians, members of the Signalmen craft have long performed such work and the work performed is incidental in nature.

A literal reading of Rule 67 would support the Organization's contention that it does not limit electrical work to arty specific equipment. The Organization has also pointed out -chat an affirmative defense, such as the claim by the Carrier that members of the Signalmen craft have historically performed such work places a burden of proof upon the Carrier to substantiate such a claim. However, the Carrier has contended, and was not effectively refuted, that the "repair" itself was so "de minimus" as to require a mere cursory inspection and reconnection of a wire, all of which took five minutes. The simplicity of this task, the limited skill involved and the brief time involved have historically been bases to mitigate claims which might otherwise be found to have merit. We so find here.






                          By Order of Second Division


Attest: Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board

                            ,~


    R emarie Brasch - Administrative Assistant


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 9th day of May, 1978.

                                I