Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 7557
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 7451
2-BNI-MA-'78
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Arthur T. Van Wart when award was rendered.
( International Association of Machinists and
( Aerospace Workers
Parties to Dispute:
(
( Burlington Northern Inc.
Dispute: Claim of Employes:
Claim of the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace
Workers that the Carrier:
1. Violated Rule 40(a) of the April 1, 1970 Shop Crafts Agreement
by its failure to furnish good drinking water artificially cooled
in Hillyard Shops commencing with Monday, January 19, 1976;
2. Pay each employee of the Machinists' Craft employed in Hillyard
Shops $3.00 per day commencing with January 19, 1976 and
continuing on each work day thereafter until good drinking
water, artificially cooled, was furnished in Hillyard Shops.
Findings:
The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and
all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this
dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the
Railway Labor Act as approved Jun-3 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute
involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing thereon.
Carrier maintains a Hillyard Shop complex at Spokane, Washington, for
the purpose of overhauling and repairing its diesel locomotives and roadway equipment. Complaint was filed January 16, 1976. It was alleged
therein that Carrier failed to furnish good drinking water in said shop
facilities in compliance with Agreement Rule 40 - "Condition of Shop" -
which in pertinent part, provides:
"(a) Good drinking water, artificially cooled when
necessary, will be furnished. Drinking fountains
will be provided where practicable."
Form 1 Award No.
7557
Page
2
Docket No.
7451
2-BNI-MA-'78
The record reflects that water to the Hillyard facility, except for
the Powerhouse, had been furnished from a 60 year old well by means of an
air-activated piston action booster pump. Said pump was lubricated by
oil, some of which, because of worn packing, dropped in extreme miniscule
amounts into the water, which apparently gave rise to the complaint that
the water at Hillyard was contaminated. Carrier, after receipt of such
complaint, immediately contacted the State of Washington's Health Services
Division and arranged for a water analysis. The State took a sample of
said water on Monday, January
19, 1976
and forwarded same to its laboratory
in Seattle, Washington for analysis. Carrier also posted signs recommending
that the drinking fountain not be used.
Carrier then furnished city water, in 10 gallon Igloo containers,
taken from the Powerhouse. These Igloo containers were cleaned and filled
daily. Complaint was made, at the end of February, that such cleaning and
filling was not sanitary. Arrangements were then made to have the function
performed under the direction and inspection by a member of the organization.
Carrier also contacted the Spokane County Health District and requested
a bacteriological analysis, the samples for which were taken March 30,
1976.
Negative results were received April
7, 1976.
Additionally, phenol
tests were performed by ABC Laboratories of Spokane on April
8, 1976.
Negative results therefrom were received April
9, 1976.
The final
results of the tests by the state were received April
9, 1976.
All tests
results indicated that the water was potable and that it never constituted
a health hazard.
The Board finds that while there was some delay to ascertaining with
specificity the potability of the water complained of such delay was not
of Carrier's making. Notwithstanding, the fact does remain that the water
of complained of was "good drinking water". Further, that during the
period of awaiting the results of the water analysis, the record does not
reflect any showing that water furnished in the Igloo containers was not
good drinking water.
Consequently, it is held that the necessary burden of the proving
the threshold issue in this Claim, to wit - that Carrier has not furnished
good drinking water, was not met by the petitioning party. Merely saying
something is so, unfortunately, doesn't make it so. The Employees therefore
failed to carry their burden of proof. Rule 40(a) eras not shown to have
been violated. It is not necessary, therefore to reach and pass upon the
monetary aspect of the claim. In the circumstances this Claim will be
denied.
Form 1 Award No. 7557
Page
3
Docket No. 7451
2-BNI-MA-'78
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Second Division
Attest: Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board
BY .2 ~.z..~ __
Z-~
os marie Brasch - Administrative Assistant
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 16th day of June,
1978.