Foxr1 I TJATIOETAL 17~'=T,OIID f~DJ~TSThi~'l`vu_C' ROAJ'O Award No. 7577
 SFCO1"uP 1);I_VISIO~''T Docket No. 7117'1



    The Second Division consited of the regu .ap neKners and in addition Re'u.ree W'-anber C. Wallace when award was rendex'cd.


                ( Systerl I'edera-i.;ion ,,To. 105 , IIa; ~_:,~~ -W:ra~doyes'

                I)e( '_ .~_ _

                      ~aarar:.etxtP.. I' of' h. C~. I. 0.

Partie° to T)isxr.Ite· ( (Carmen)

                ( Union Pacific Failyoud Co::pany


Dispute: 'Claim. G _'v %nlo_;=eu _.

    (l) That the Union Pacific _;a'.Zroud Co=L7ran,'v' _ has unjustly dealt

                                                  ~;?.i.',._-!.

        Carjl,anl I`. C. Carlson, Pocatello, Td~:J-io,~?L~C~n i)e vas ",--ir~OVC(I

        from c,er°v, 1-0:t ~i7u, o: cf `~, 'y

          r, . ;.ce ~,,~.: :~. »~_; l._,,~ charges : ~.violating Crvar

                                                ~~,

                                                :

        Rule 700.


        That rccordinly ,;lie Union Pacific Ral:?r_iud Cn.r:._`-".ray be o2acred

        t0 reinstate D. C . Carl C?' to KS fOl...: E'., T-O, KiOn US Stated Q

        - ,- t,. t _ - c

                              .r_ , ;: n , .., ._ ,~ 1949,

        which ..,..:, ('1:,17:';c.O_ to >>'tJ.~_E: _.,7 a.ll- li:c i =~_1 ~CCv .- °~ m.-... `(i iw`_, lia

        i'i0~%E';':~):.. 1. ,1!76. ~i_.th ciLll.'i for all t1:.- lo.'A: n~°U`, 6, a2?.?,1.1?,.L

        1?:i~·'.:;C'E.'. a for all t...__: lost all vacation ,,_a seniority r!;;lJV.

        W"2S tCL'F.'d. all 11C=. _ C'. and v:0'f'a.L'e tJenC:'1~1ts .'.Yl.d T__su't. -':.. 'f' bE.nC C' _ . N , all credit due und.:_ Railrond ,ati rcaaent a?id ununp'Lc;, -;nt


        _ _ ~ r : '; -~

        1??.`.',L1m.:C~'r7't n1'?;y other bE';!;li;:'..,tF: t!^ 1'T;117_.:.d have E'c:.,_'21''C1 i`l~=.1.:..C' K.L(y

        .._ UL?''G of service.


Findings:

 The Second Division of the Adjustment Board., upon the whole record _,;1:.1 all the evidence, finds that:

 The carrier or carriers and the ~'','?'fi~_[y'~.·f: or erri::loye- ; involved 1rl this
 dispute wY,e rea T a.' nde e~)1C 'l - Z a 1r:e..
 spla.~.~ ~ :~T::~t9 ~ .vly carrier a 11'I. . ~ . ~ ,Tithi Y1 ._ th ~tl'i ng of i;h'e

 Ra:i_:1_s' u;y- Labor Act as aiprcm~cd mane 21., 1934.

 TThis Division of the Adjustmeuc Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.

    Parties of LG said , - : ~ . n y

    Parties Q1:pp7'vG waived ed ..~. ~, Evp_ .r)e2i,'?CE. at hearing at ~g. .~_hE.'~ ~ 'E.C:1;.


ClaanaI1t S'7%.% s cited for .i.1:FZ'`E~ 'l,:! ~'C2~..·:5~1 for conduct unnl)ccomI_n;; I3.°a E-, .Ti?G?.~E`;y ~: :l_;1 connfcti(":I .-~1:': ills- arrest and cba ;e C?°1° g1_and lorceny on Dec.'nher ;11'
                                                  .

            .r.

75 by -the -~OC`.CWir'_)r~..C) ;E%C-°.~_~.c,. 't':IdCt! 00....'.". E'.'.' alleges was a violation of Rule

 700 (,)'E' the :';1~1^., ._.:C7 _Cnstructjono u:'L,I-~c `ct1J"C'_ ~i)-,.=Y' :a-nC% ?'1 Ct.Ct':'~I;__',L'y
                                              .r


Dte ~>~.t":J??E-_'_I~l'C, .
 1''oXlfl 1 Fag e 2

 AYY a,L U. No . 7,7 7
 Dochet No. 70-a
 2-U%'-CI.',- ` 7 8
    lilt the investigation C1_airriant rx.~hnowled.t;ed that he pled guilty to u,

lesser charge of petty larceny; that he rexlnbur::ed. the city y ;~1100.00 p.-;-Us
 $7.50 court cc,-it; that tree Court withheld jzzd~:;nLT·_i; fo)' a peiod of six
                      ,

(6) monzuns dur':i.ng vr:iic.h vi7.:.e C,la4Lman'L ix,s on p.r~c>ba.tvan; ar~;:~ 2v the end of
 that period, the Cou).'t. anon a Y:iotion, uouId da 7;ri s,s the cha.r°L_;es and x_is record. would be cleared.
This Board can place no significc-o?ce on the fact th~it C :La9?,,a:~t s record waas cl(-_>_')'ed by the Court. He acknowledged comnitting the offense which placed 111?:': ! 1'1 violation of the 3.fOl.'C:iE:'.1L.1C.:'~.c:CL R-ale '~rU-). Sl7_Cia set7.l;.'S though not ne-;at%tcd, n_-rve been held -Lo ire w°e wsonn:r;'1e and fair whare pex'l:aining la:) such cha.vges ass here ux-I _ ti:.. ce!'.ona Division Award _o. 682-': upheld Carrier's dimszal under ciruunstances Post sini1 ; r ..:o the case at hand. We f:_ d,C3. no'..._;7.5 upon which this Board cou.i CL .~_C3`,- C;..1_.l.y -In'Ge'.Mere with Cax'x'IeY S' cLction.

      'urtimi r,rc ., ar,ts contention l,he ~'.S.i

    In'Cr°e, the zc o%°c'L wup^1o~_ S_"L;~ ~:an~,.~;. . ~~eT_~ i.an ~. that ..

eras not handle-d ~.r-ii;ii.-rz 'c~Jn~ -7.-i?nitprescrs,bed by Article ",- <>f the kugust
 21, 1954 Nation"-:L A3Ye:mc0'U. TM fact also is (3. ~)c?.t1 'GU c_)b';'i.'~''lZ~'1:11~,~`
 Carr~ ex'' a action.

 A ~'! A R ..II

 Claim denied.

 Utest: Executive Secretary
 National Wlrrm3i Adjustment Board

 T'IAMC)'`TU PY.11-1U _''~:i~ii;i'_~'_~.v'Z' .3G`\.
 13y Order of Second Div,.zion

 ~. ~f~OS "?;!d.7.'a.~ 151'aSC:Ti ° r V
                  J~_,1t'~15~1'e1~t~_ftJ^~S~`~:L.II,%i.T1~C~


Dated at~Chicu.F.o _Ill:ino:i.s> this 23rd day oz June, 197th.