Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 7644
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 7363
2-MP-MA-'78





Parties to Dispute:



Dispute: Claim of Employes:



Findings:

The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

. The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this
dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the
Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.



This is an appeal from a thirty (30) day disciplinary suspension assessed Claimant in connection with his alleged failure to comply with instructions from his foreman and an act of insubordination which occurred on June 8, 1975.

We find there to be substantial evidence in the ,record establishing the charge against Claimant. Foreman Woodard's direct testimony concerning this incident was corroborated by Mechanical Superintendent McCaddon. It is clear that claimant resisted his Foreman's orders to move his personal automobile to the proper parking area and, under the guise of illness, went home rather than obeying the Foreman's instructions. Thus, a prima facie case of insubordination was established.
Form 1 Award No. 7644
Page 2 Docket No. 7363
2-MP-MA-'78

Further, we do not think the discipline assessed, thirty days, was excessive under the circumstances.

Since we have considered the merits of this case and found them unsubstantiated, it is not necessary that we consider the procedural issues in this case. (Second Division Award 4820).






                          By Order of Second Division


Attest: Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board

BY
      o emarie Brasch - Administrative Assistant


Dated a Chicago, Illinois, this 4th day of August, 1978.