Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 7647
' SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 7401
2-ICG-EW-'7$





Parties to Dispute: ( (Electrical Workers)




Dispute: Claim of Employes:





Findings:

The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.



The threshold issue in this case is whether ARCS Technicians are assigned in road service which would require the application of the meal expense provisions of Rules 12 and 17 of the Section B agreement. The Carrier contends that ARCS Technicians' travel within the Chicago terminal area does not constitute road service. The Organization contends these employees are assigned headquarters points and they are sent out on road service in designated territories within their seniority district. The headquarters points cited by the Organization are Hazelcrest, the 124th Street shop and the Randolph Street Shop in the Chicago area.
Form 1 Award No. 7647
Page 2 Docket No. 7401
2-ICG-EW-'78

The Memorandum of Agreement dated April 25, 1975 applicable to ARCS Employes provides, in part:



The exclusive commuter service tracks and the facilities for this service are all located in the Chicago area. ARCS employees may leave their headquarters, go out to various facilities to repair equipment at one of these facilities and return to their headquarters at the end of the day. No overnight travel is involved.

Rule 17 applies to employees "regularly assigned to perform road work". ARCS employees clearly do not have such regular assignments. Rule 12, on the other hand, applies to employees "sent out on the line of road to fill vacancies or to perform any other work". This case depends on the meaning of "line of road". ARCS employees are sent out from their headquarters, but are they sent out on the line of road. Other employees covered by the Section B Agreement and occupying a job in one of the exclusive Chicago Terminal seniority districts defined in Rule 32B have not claimed or been allowed such noon meal expenses, nor were they reimbursed pursuant to the award from Public Law Board No. 1540. This Board does not believe the claimants have shown that they were sent out on the line of road to perform their work. The claim therefore must be denied.






                          By Order of Second Division


Attest: Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board

By cr
arie Brasch - Adminibtrative Assistant
Dated hicago, Illinois, this 4th day of August, 1978.