Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No .7653
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 7370
2-CRI&P-CM-'78





Parties to Dispute: ( (Carmen)



Dispute: Claim of Employes:







Findings:

The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.



The Carrier in this case entered into an agreement in 1974 with an outside firm for the purpose of scrapping and retiring freight cars. The agreement provided in part:


Form 1 Award No. 7653
Page 2 Docket No. 7370


Certain usable parts were to be returned to the Carrier. The Carrier also agreed to a lease to permit the outside firm to enter upon the Carrier's property to perform its work.

Numerous awards have held that a Carrier is free to sell its property and such a sale would not violate Classification of Work Rules. An examination of the actual sales order to the outside firm shows the Carrier was compensating the firm for the work it performed by allowing a 37.6 mark-up on the floating price of scrap. The Carrier also retained rights to reusable parts from the cars. The primary purpose of such an agreement was not a sale, but the contracting out of work. Such work was covered by the classification of work rule. See Second Division Awards 6529 and 68oo.



    Claim sustained.


                          NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD

                          By Order of Second Division


Attest: Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board

      semarie Brasch - Administrative Assistant


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 15th day of August, 1978.