Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No.
7655
SECOND DIVISION Docket No.
71+17
2-MP-CM-'78.
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Robert G. Williams when award was rendered.
( System Federation No. 2, Railway Employes'
( Department, A. F. of L. - C. I. 0.
Parties to Dispute: ( (Carmen)
(
( Missouri Pacific Railroad Company
Dispute: Claim of Employes:
That under the controlling agreement Carman R. V. Jarrett, Kansas
City, Missouri, was unjustly withheld from service beginning
September 2,
1975,
and following investigation was unjustly
dismissed from the service of the Missouri Pacific Railroad Company
on October
17, 1975.
2. That accordingly, the Missouri Pacific Railroad Company be ordered
to compensate Carman Jarrett as follows:
a) Compensate him in the amount of eight hours
(8')
per day,
five
(5)
days per week beginning September 2,
1975,
until
returned to service;
b) Return him to service with seniority ,rights unimpaired;
c) Make him whole for all vacation rights;
d) Make him whole for all health and welfare and insurance
benefits;
e) Make :`m whole for pension benefits including Railroad
Retir, mt and Unemployment Insurance;
f) Make
::tin
whole for any other benefits that he would have
earned during the time he was held out of service.
Findings:
The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and
all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this
dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the
Railway Labor Act as approved June 21,
1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute
involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing thereon.
'Form 1 Award No.
7655
Page 2 Docket No.
7417
2-MP-CM-178
Claimant was discharged following a hearing held on October 14,
1975
for his failure to comply with instructions of his superiors to fill out
Form
52002,
Carrier's fo.,zn concerning personal injuries sustained by
employes.
The evidence overwhelmingly establishes that Claimant refused to
comply with instructions from Car Foreman Womble and Superintendent H. C.
Gruenkemeyer and General Car Foreman Gosvenor, on September
2, 1975;
instructions properly issued to Claimant governing instructions and
requirements contained in Carrier's rules.
We have previously recognized that a Carrier is entitled to have
its employes complete personal injury information forms totally and
honestly. Failure to comply with instructions relating to this is an act
of insubordination - a very serious offense, and we cannot quarrel with
management's decision to terminate Claimant for this act of insubordination.
In Carrier's submission, they note that about three months after
Claimant's discharge, he was afforded an opportunity to be reinstated on a
leniency basis (without pay for time lost) if Claimant would agree to
properly complete Form 52002. The Local Committee of Petitioner's
organization conveyed this offer to Claimant and nothing was heard from
him. It seems apparent that in light of the foregoing, Claimant is not
interested in returning to the service of the Carrier. However, we will
accord him one additional opportunity to complete the form and return to
service on the basis of the offer made by Carrier on the property.
Claimant shall have sixty (60) days from the date of our adoption of this
decision to elect whether he wishes to return to service under these terms.
If he responds in the negative, or fails to act within sixty (60) days,
then this claim will stand denied in its entirety.
A W A R
D
Claim disposed of as set forth in the opinion.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTNLENT BOARD
By
Order of Second Division
Attest: Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board
By
~.·~u
semarie Brasch - Administrative Assistant
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 15th day of August,
1978.