Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD AD,7USTI.TI'T.i' EOARD Award No. 777-6
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 7556
2-G`ft^T-FO- ` 78





Parties to Dispute: ( (Firemen & Oilers)




Dismite: Claim of F:mploVTes:






F9_nd:in;s:

The Second Di.v:i_sion of the Adjust-cat Board, upon the whole record and allthe evic3.erce, finds th-t:

The carrier or carriers and the e: -, ploye or errp:Loyesinvolved in this dispute are respectively carrier and em,oloye ~,rithiti the meaning of. the Railway Labor Act as approved Tune ?1, 19

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the displ;.t; involved herein.



Claimant herein was disrri_ssed, after hearing, for allegedly being in violation of Carrier's operating Rule 3(b), which provides in pertinent part:



The evidence in this dispute in clear and uncontroverted. Claimant was found at 11: 40 P.M. (his starting t::ne was 1_1:00 P.M.) on the lunchroom floor, passed out. Subs.>quently at tire hosr._~;a.l he was diagnosed as beinunder the influence of alcohol. 'Claimant adrni.tteci to having hard two

beers and a No Do:;~ .pill prior to r,~pomt;v_ng for ~~;orli.
Form 1 Award No. 7716
Page 2 Docket No. 7556
2_GB,l_1;,U_ `78

Cases such as that herein have been legion in this industry. There is little usef'.tlness in reiterating and underscoring Carrier's res_ponsibilit':.es to its own employer as well as the .public. There can be no question but that the discipline i.nnposed in this dispute was both justified and <Appropr.r,Lte.








Attest: Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board

By - , ~.vP ~ ~,__yy P., y,o.,a a....'''d ..~_~ a~ __,.r'"~F^-'_?" ..,~`=_.~d`. ~S.~.m....~"''

~.1~os;:.:_ar:ie BYwsch - t"~.~;:.:i n~ st,r~:,tive :lssi:aant

Dated a,~1 Chicago, Illinois, !-.his 1st day of, TTovezaber, 1978.