Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUST= BOARD Award ido.
7775
SECOND DIVISION Docket T::?o.
7588
2-scL-EW-178
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Robert A. Franden when award was rendered.
( System Federation No.
42,
Railway Employes'
( Department, A. F. of L. - C I. 0.
Parties to Dispute: ( (Electrical Workers)
(
(Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Company
Dispute-
Clam
of Fmplayes:
1. That the Seaboard Coast Line unjustly, 5m_properly, and without
supporting the burden of proof d:isx2issed Electrician Apprentice
Steven B. favelsky from service beginning Jmly
19, 1976.
2.
That accordingly, the Carrier be ordered to remove this unjust
and improper dismissal from the service record of the C;la;._:nant and
compensate him far aLI time lost in connection therewith, beginning
July 2,
1.9`76
(date of improper suspensJ -on), th ralzgh and including
such date as he is properly restored to tire set-vice of the Carrier.
3.
In addition, that Claimant be
reinstated
n; i.th a.1-`L seniority
rights, vacation rights and privileges, insurance ri ghts and
protection. as well as all
other
compensation lost as a result of
this improper and unjust dismissal.
Findings:
The S econd Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and
all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employer involved in this
dispute are respectively cattier and em._ploya within the meaning of the
Railway Labor Act as approved June 21,
1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute
involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right a' appearance at hearing thereon.
Claimant was dismissed from the service of the Carrier for an alleged
violation of Carrier Rule No. 18 "the possession or use of intoxicants or
narcotics while on duty or on Company prop--t~ty is _prohi_bited'". Claimant was
held out of service for five
(5)
days pending investigation, after which an
investigation was held pursuant to proper notice.
1
Foam 1 Award No. 7775
Page 2 Docket No.
7588
2-SCL-EW-'78
The submissions in this case including the transcript of the investigation
support the Carrier's finding that the violation was committed. This is a
serious offense for which dismissal is a .proper remedy. We find no reason
to disturb the discipline in this case.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMMa1T BOARD
By Order of Second Division
Attest: Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board
*, _
semarie Brasch - t~dn.inistrative Assistant
Dated at Chicago,, Illinois, this 20th day of December,
1978.
I