Form 1 TV0=COMh RN:Chai0LD
ADaUR'T'iir;:'~7L BOARD Award No.
(789
S I]COT'D DIVISION Docket Tio.
77l3-T
2-MP-CM-179
The ,`_iecond Division
consisted of the
re;ualar t.mI)ers and in
addition
Referee Abraham u-?olss when award was tendered.
System Federation No. 2, Railway
17,-Pployes'
( Depax"W:ent, A. f' of L. - C. T. 0.
I'at^tie:
'LG D'1.::'nu'tE':
( (Ca?'7?lEn)
( Missouri Pacific Railroad Company
T)7.stTutP:
0.^,7m
of
i'r7tv_?t:)yCS:
(1 ) i't-!at the Missouri Pacific Railroad Company
violated
A°r^"t'aJ-ClE
V
of the A`;zecmezzt of Janu=y 1?. 1.9(e mhen they contracted <:at
1'TI'CCZi:LIi`n', SE'.:'~I:LC:C`. On
th''
`:r_SO''J.'t:':L
`,..&f'ic T;
ai_lxO%L::1.
tO uL,.. _i(:'.i'COt"~_
t3c:lt and rlc'r.;n:inal Rai_t's:=.rl Company,
Cctobc):'
3.''., 1976,
Con the
mainline
north
^ r
1
n
'lint:
just ~ h n'
;,Yla - .,'c
Trt
31, 1976,
on the
t~Yt'!
_. [oer,~'~.}'Train ~. T5. ..x , .~ , __es:= .
ThE'
H0L7--Lori
--Pelt
and ri'e,Y.:'i7illal
Rr`1.',,l1_'c'7.'.:,d
wrecking crew
V':UQE';i
:L
:C" il
.L~'.I'fi, , C;'C"~v0(_JC:(.'
Jl, 1976 uuntil 8:00 A.,',,,, 1,
1976.
(2) That the Missouri Pacific Railroad Company be
ordered tc cu°...:.ns3tc
Carmen A.
v°~.
1 . C Barber,
a.
_. Cu1LeyF. Topez, arid R. 0.
2,zv~_r;oc~ ..dWilson in the '.mount of eight
(8)
hours
and :f'I.Ken (15)
minutes
at the punitive rate account of this violation.
Findings.
.
The
Second Division of
the
Adjustment
Board,
upon the
whole record and
a11We evldcrace,
i'inGs
-shat:
...
The carrier on ca;,rriex's
and the
etaploye or employes
involved in thL3
dispute
rare res;7ert9.vol,r carrier and employe within
the
moaning of the
Railway LuboL'
Apt as approved June 21,
1934.
This Division of the adjustment Board has 'jurisdiction
over
the
dispute
involved herein.
Patties to said dispute
waived
right of appearance at hearing
thereon.
Petitioner . ' ax'xCarrier violated the provi.c:i.crx s of Article V
assexus that (, Cw_
of
the
Agrcer:,c::w
efa
ectavre
January
1_2,
7_x'76
Zrlia::rz
on
Cctobcx'
31,
1976 t lie
retailing of four z'x.night cars was contracted
to
the Houston
belt and
Terminal Rallyoad.
The parties and applicable Agreements
are
identical
to those recently
considered by this Division in Award 7`j45 (Rom3ia.s ). Only the date of the
accuuNnence differs.
I
F o r:in 1
la,ge ?_
hwa.z~d
Tao. 7789
Docket No.
7`h3-T
2-110--CIO-
t
7 9
This Division MY' :in .tti·,arc1
7745 that Article V of the Agre(E~meruL
effective Jc?.n1aZ'y' 12,
1976, Van uhich Petitioner relied during the processing
of the claim on the property, anE.ndea a. prior . yr'oe:nent which established
a Special board of fa.dj'~.,wt:r:cnt
with
c<:cl_usive
aiuMucTiction. over
dispute-,
involving
£llbC;oI'1tI`aCt·:_n,.;
ACC;OX'G.1".'';.Ly,
in 7.. ~ ;;11
`u
of the
C'x:.'l"'..i
vCe
Jptyi_3iCti0YCW'iS7Ch
Ci`?5futeS vested in :Mi_:aJDl Board Gf Adjustment,
the Divisor!. dismissed
thee
claim fog =? acli of jurisdiction. We concur in
the
reasoning,
f:I_11d1ngo and
GOY1Cl'L7C':ioi.,J
set
forth in Award 7745.
A 41
!'1
1i IO
Claim d:i.sm;. ssEd
for
Iac1c- of ju-,~Lsdiction.
Olr'.I'.ZdN'AL F'~A.1LL:Oi?''~ ~lJ,7~Tii L'~'i~: 1 BOnFi)
By Order of Second Division
AtC:St:
FXC;C:1&A've
uGC'.Y':t.`vt'y
i:atlona:L Ra9.I_l:°c,ad Adjustnerit Board
L'_'Gl.i>CII°..Z-V~1;_xa.C 1J.7 JtX'a1,i'Je
11s
Dated at Ch:LUa:~a,
Illinois.,
. 3
.u
f anuary, l9'79