Form l NATIONAL VIM= AWTUS'I`"·MA.C BOARD Award No. f (90
 SECOY;D 7KTS10T? Dookc+ No. u7? 6
 -B:Ji-BK-' 'l9






Parties to D's_sm;ute: ( (I~l~:,cksani,t~_;~



D9_s~ute: C1a5.rn-of T~mrV:Lo~,re s

        That in '~r:io:3.:~.'G~r>, of tile current agl'e° :E:nt, Bl.ac'1Lsm5_th Edward C.


'ier :.~~vice on date of

 Ger1>, Jx'., v~,:s unjustly suspended 1 x'c>.-:: Carrier 8W-%~j6 Jd·71,d 5;7~:`~`~::C1tJ;,·:"iV.iy dl.suia s`::f C.. !',L'OT:1 r.ey,vice on date o2
 August 2, 1976.

        That accordingly, RZ.c?C>.`>1'i:i.vh Edward G. (Yt`1.'k, Jr. bn made whole,

        restored t0 Carrier Sc^?''V'-!.C::'. ",-::'.t:h nil :.'C:i10r1ty rights, vc1C:=.t=t!,

        rights, holidays, ;`'·iC_ Move l)' ....a.'..i= W. t:.nr·_ ,^_·,.1l Girl:`:.' benefits that

        are a cond'it;c11 of ~u=,y)lo~^-..~ni,, unimpaired and s'#".ar"tIng with 5_ _,_

        Of >nl;t;`L)_s'f: 3, .L)(''( coa''1peils,'~ta_l,"? for all 10s_'.''v i.`1, e plus C '7 .-._,.ii1e:..1.

        interest c>n all such lost ,. ,··c, also raimbursemeM fcr all

        losses su::tainc:,C1, --,ccounit loss ofW.overas-~ under H_W and welfare

        and life insurance C:,·~'J'L^c','o;=.^_.;?tN during the time hola 00t of service.


Findings:
    The Secolm-~_ Division of tho Adjustment Dos.r'd, upon the whole record anft

., . all the evidence, finds ~hac:

 The ca.priE: z ox carriers and the employe or u,~,,,rloyos involved in dispute are respectively carrier and emp:Lcye within the meaning of the
 '°~ ~ , Ra5_:L,aay Labor Act a..., a..pp;.ovc:d Jane P'1__, 1.93'~.

 This Division of the Adjustment Board has jusisdiction over the dispute involved herein.

    Patties to said dispute waived right of a.ppea.xanc:e at hearing thereon.


CZc`3.11;iwtlt, 8,n employee with 18 yc`J.Y'S' service with Carrier, was dismissed
 fop striking another employee, The claim presented and discussed on the
 property a:rOi)11't·.`:C_ in essence t0 a plea for 1°-'~':).?1s':0el?let1L on a leniency
 bas' .1s., withou't: b::..c'-, tDay, on. 'Gi?v grounds trl.at C1-,-Z,.,,nant was ill.

    During con, L'C:(.`e11G'C`S between the Organination and Carrier officials,


                            .,

the Carrier c`"t'%'S' i::CL to i''C:'7..`:Est%:gfi' l~.c..1.T!":<'_,_.1'v :i.:i .1r' V;G J.d >L1'J::17_'t: T^C:da.Cc..1_ statements as "'VO h5.s phy'S?:.1;'.l and E'?T1C)ts.C?:F3..1 f':1.'tit';';S", sAbject to review and concurrence by Carrier's C'tu:iE:f :iadic:~a.~. 01ar·.ZCUr.

 Claimant :,ubr:'la.tted a doctor's report l:ini.c:v Halv with his physical condition.
 Foxes 1 Page 2

Award. No. 7?i'0

Dochet No. 7716

2-f's'`TT-l3ii-' `T9


Based on the Eai:ti-culvr facts of this case, we are of the opinion tlm_a Claimant :;huu1d be reinstated to service without ba:c3.= Day s,ubjecvs ho.re~rer°, to v;he condition W:av CZai:~.~1t; will be ~~euired to submit to a co:aplet;e efa:rIri.nat-".on bar Carrier's Chief I-Iedica1. Ofice.r to Usteimir!e ,.~r?1Eth.e:c he is ciuali:'Cied to ,return to service, ,

 A j^? A R D

 Clain to tl-,e extent and in the set forth in

 T?!~'T:COII`;:'1h EYJ"Y,t;n'iD ADJT)ST,-Ii-,',"'IT BOARD
 By Order oz Second

 Attest: Erecmc:ive Sect°etv,z,y
 National Railroad Adjustment, Board

                      1979.

Anninistvative Assistant

 Dated at~ Chicago, I7.1ino:m, this ~'~h day of Unwa ry, 1979.