Form 1 PTATIONVI-1, FAIZRO,''-.D ADJIJS'fMI,:`?T B01RD  Avraxd No. 
7792
 
SECOI1D DIVISTOiV Doc;ket P?o. 771
   
2-Bnzz-Fo- 
t 
79
the Second Division consisted of the regular mombers and in
addition Referee hbx°u_han Weiss w0n award was rendered.
( System Fedox°s.ti. on 
TITO . 7, 
Izr.:i lvray F:rnployes'
( I)epax"tmen ~~ , l'
.. 
F of Z . - C . I . 0.
PaW,ies to Disrnte: ~  (Firemen & Oilers)
,_~_ ...
( IS~iingtor. Ioxrirhey°tl Inc.
Dispute
: 
C1a:iri of Err~rlovcs:
 
-, ..
1.. Under the 
C'U?__",t,'L'rit 
controlling Agreement, Mr. John ~. 
IWW'-i.S,  :10%::.E:r'
 
lw:b0:°(e', 
L)Gtl_;rC?r, 
Colorado, 
'S·.%:-.,e. 17Y1j1. E."~t:`_5'' 
dealt 
'r;ri'ti1 
and 
diNY1.`..:.v':a.
 
from SF'Y"J"iCe of '01.10 Dtzr.l.lnr;i;o?'l 
1`IOL"t11exI1, 1r.1C. E::i.'f'~C1~;~''IE: OC'tC)'!Je2,'
 
17_, 176.
2. That, aoroxdir_[:,',-, the Bux'J.rin~ton I;or-tl-,a=k-n, Inc. be mdered 
to
reinstate Ui,". John 
T. L:;'T1S 
to service,: 1'-''ith 
';J`.',y?:'cYlt 10~." 
Ono
lost at the pxo Ma. rate, izv.r.l_'ac1_i?s;y all fringe benafits and
a_
reference to~ this incident stricken ~i'?°cm his record.
).,,ila, 
. Y
t.i.:fi':'
The Second Division cf the 
11d_jus'amcnt 
Board, upon the whole record 
an,31.
PL:i.l 
the ov-ldonce, finds that-
The carrier or carriers and the enp3_oys or employes invoived in this
dispute 
a?.'0. 
respectively 
C.2 
rx`leL' and E:.'.i??.L.O'Te within 
t11G' 
?r~::a?! 
a_I1~; O:1' 
the
Rai~h':ay Labor Act as approved June 21, 
1934.
 
This Division of ,he Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the di;.w,abe
itlvolved herein.  ._
tarries to ;,raid dispute ;%ra-i veer 
ri.Lo;ht 
of appearance at hearing thereon.
Claimant w;as discl_aroed fox violation of Carrier's Safety Mules 
5~;
and 
65:1_ 
on the grounds tact 1_e was in possession of a fixea,v:n while on
duty and that he threatened a fellow e?n,aLoyee by pointing the gun at her
head.
 
Safety Rule 51+ prohibits the possession while on duty of loaded ox
unloaded 
fi.i~:awsa R -ale 
66J._ 
fates that employees will not be retained.
1r1. 
service who 
v,Y."O 
careless of tile safety of 
t11E:131:.">E.'l'S'GS 01:' 
Ot!lc^..7.^S.
Claimant stated wt tha hearir~,:; that he had intended to leave his rein
at home, but tllerl he e~h'1.~:'~_iccl tl~zi; lye shored it to the eznp:Lo;;~aos pxese:w
at the lunch pl<;.ce v::i.th tine, :intcnt,;_orz of selling it. He also stated tnat
the 
gan 
had no cylinder. 
he 
denied. 
po:! 
ri,:i_n 
g 
the Lt?rz at 
tr.~ 
h~:: 
z:,,d 
of the
felloTr employee, I:irmohved.
Form 1
Page 2
Ai,rard To. 
77°a
Docket To. 018
2-B!T-FO-79
Claimant first denied ownership of a 
firearm 
when 
questioned by
Carrier's Spcclul Agent, but 
then admitted 
cr;Jlm:rsrip after it had bee:i
,recovered 
by ./ 
1 , ' . 1[1e 
distance ~ir.e Special S I;et f';c.;._~ ~ :., crate lc'c:<.:i;ed at o;~_. f'!°c_
the 
SCene of ·1...11E'. 
incident, 
He also 
admitted th"t carrying the pistol
not normal practice and that 
he 
had no authority to 
carry it.
Fetit5en.e r contends that the absence of the cylinder ._°,~,dl~ his gun "antique" 
x'atii:.r t.zan 
4 "ii 
x'e4:,r-m" as used. in 
I,L:_`(.f: 511. 
`llz,_' s conten.V_on is
 
effectively 
l'i:.E`t?tE'C1 
r)y 
C'_'y'1`:..eY 'S C:i.'l,=L'ai.C3.'1 
from 
'1,}.1C-. 
United 
States 
Code Annotated
 
"firearms"  
It, 
,. 
_ 11
defining  ~;.ra,d _-_ut ~_j,ue 
f~_.~w'=.xm . i-.'.ox'ec;v(:r' Rule 
5>r:?ilces no
distinction between 1uad.od and unloadcd guns.
Three -y _. ,. ` . . ~,,... r ~  s ~  of ' fi.1°ea 
r-E'W,'_J.~O~; 
FeS c.~`t:;..v'vC';~. to 
C~_E~,i.' . , ACJ 
.w 
~C?s~aC~o 
1CI1 U . the  
_
and aiming it at 
the head 
G;'" 
one of tilts:"-. 
TL'1'1.:1 'GEC 2i; 1_I"10rJy 
-,-._* not X't=.r)Llt1.~O.
in the 
rC^OxC. 
C! 
t T3af % t 
s`. 
P,S`'°rl! 
y?G1;t 
he knew 
that the pistol would nQ
.tW .
fire UC;e;; not excuse his 
aC':._~tJYi..
Claimant's 
(xja<?rA,=tr,.(JYl 
that 1')C: had originally intended to leave th,,:
gun at home: bn 
that t;('e?'! he discovered he had 
j.1. 
on 1':;x.5 person he showed
1.t 
to 
1115 
follow,Git:i_>.l.('7,`v'E:(':' :~_r; 
01`l!: 
. 'GU , e
il it 
':_5 Z '1CUn'::L.L).G 
Au=;s 
fspW :_. 
_._h~r
S:LY?%e9 as he 
..a_.?l'::c),1n5. ...') had no 
Cyl:..:?d_e3x'.
We finds 
accordingly, t:zu't 
the 
charge 
againot MOW is fully
supported by the evidence and 'c:...7.l, 
to 
,jc2""ore, 
deny the c3sin.
A 
1,'T 
A R 1)
Claim! denied.
At-Lest: 
Execiit-.tve 
Secretary
 
National Railx 
o'L 
a 
Ad jus t.n ent 
Board
NI1`PSOIIIAL T;AMRO!O 
!1DJ,,T311.D?.i"1.' BOAI:U)
 
Order of 
wcCOnd DiV`.:iOn
t
Dated at Chi.ca`o, Illinois,, 
this 4th day of January, 
7_979.