Form 1 PTATIONVI-1, FAIZRO,''-.D ADJIJS'fMI,:`?T B01RD Avraxd No. 7792
SECOI1D DIVISTOiV Doc;ket P?o. 771
2-Bnzz-Fo- t 79





PaW,ies to Disrnte: ~ (Firemen & Oilers)

,_~_ ...



Dispute : C1a:iri of Err~rlovcs:











).,,ila, . Y


The Second Division cf the 11d_jus'amcnt Board, upon the whole record an,31. PL:i.l the ov-ldonce, finds that-

The carrier or carriers and the enp3_oys or employes invoived in this dispute a?.'0. respectively C.2 rx`leL' and E:.'.i??.L.O'Te within t11G' ?r~::a?! a_I1~; O:1' the Rai~h':ay Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division of ,he Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the di;.w,abe
itlvolved herein. ._



Claimant w;as discl_aroed fox violation of Carrier's Safety Mules 5~; and 65:1_ on the grounds tact 1_e was in possession of a fixea,v:n while on duty and that he threatened a fellow e?n,aLoyee by pointing the gun at her head.

Safety Rule 51+ prohibits the possession while on duty of loaded ox
unloaded fi.i~:awsa R -ale 66J._ fates that employees will not be retained.
1r1. service who v,Y."O careless of tile safety of t11E:131:.">E.'l'S'GS 01:' Ot!lc^..7.^S.

Claimant stated wt tha hearir~,:; that he had intended to leave his rein at home, but tllerl he e~h'1.~:'~_iccl tl~zi; lye shored it to the eznp:Lo;;~aos pxese:w at the lunch pl<;.ce v::i.th tine, :intcnt,;_orz of selling it. He also stated tnat the gan had no cylinder. he denied. po:! ri,:i_n g the Lt?rz at tr.~ h~:: z:,,d of the felloTr employee, I:irmohved.
Form 1 Page 2

Ai,rard To. 77°a

Docket To. 018

2-B!T-FO-79



Carrier's Spcclul Agent, but then admitted cr;Jlm:rsrip after it had bee:i
,recovered by ./ 1 , ' . 1[1e distance ~ir.e Special S I;et f';c.;._~ ~ :., crate lc'c:<.:i;ed at o;~_. f'!°c_
the SCene of ·1...11E'. incident, He also admitted th"t carrying the pistol
not normal practice and that he had no authority to carry it.

Fetit5en.e r contends that the absence of the cylinder ._°,~,dl~ his gun "antique" x'atii:.r t.zan 4 "ii x'e4:,r-m" as used. in I,L:_`(.f: 511. `llz,_' s conten.V_on is
effectively l'i:.E`t?tE'C1 r)y C'_'y'1`:..eY 'S C:i.'l,=L'ai.C3.'1 from '1,}.1C-. United States Code Annotated
"firearms" It, ,. _ 11
defining ~;.ra,d _-_ut ~_j,ue f~_.~w'=.xm . i-.'.ox'ec;v(:r' Rule 5>r:?ilces no
distinction between 1uad.od and unloadcd guns.


and aiming it at the head G;'" one of tilts:"-. TL'1'1.:1 'GEC 2i; 1_I"10rJy -,-._* not X't=.r)Llt1.~O.
in the rC^OxC. C! t T3af % t s`. P,S`'°rl! y?G1;t he knew that the pistol would nQ


fire UC;e;; not excuse his aC':._~tJYi..

Claimant's (xja<?rA,=tr,.(JYl that 1')C: had originally intended to leave th,,: gun at home: bn that t;('e?'! he discovered he had j.1. on 1':;x.5 person he showed 1.t to 1115 follow,Git:i_>.l.('7,`v'E:(':' :~_r; 01`l!: . 'GU , e il it ':_5 Z '1CUn'::L.L).G Au=;s fspW :_. _._h~r S:LY?%e9 as he ..a_.?l'::c),1n5. ...') had no Cyl:..:?d_e3x'.

We finds accordingly, t:zu't the charge againot MOW is fully supported by the evidence and 'c:...7.l, to ,jc2""ore, deny the c3sin.

A 1,'T A R 1)

Claim! denied.

At-Lest: Execiit-.tve Secretary
National Railx o'L a Ad jus t.n ent Board

NI1`PSOIIIAL T;AMRO!O !1DJ,,T311.D?.i"1.' BOAI:U)
Order of wcCOnd DiV`.:iOn

      t

Dated at Chi.ca`o, Illinois,, this 4th day of January, 7_979.