Form 1 1,ATI0.V.I! I;hILRO_·'!Tr 
I'~DJiT_~:~r.~,.T,':~ DO!.P,D Avatd. No. 7793
  
SEGOl'.iD 
i;:1.~-~ 
C:COivr Docket 1'10, 77ac-T
  
2--CRT~I'-CTi- 
t'79
The Second 
D:i.vsion 
oe~nsisted of the regular meinbers and in
addition Re:('ex^ae I;obe?~L. l1, hx'at?cZen zrllen awaid was tendered.
( 
S;Ts't;e~?L 
Fedexura:i_o:n l~To. 
6, 
ua...'Lway l:npl.oyes`
( ~ Depa_-;:hotxt, A. V. of 
T~. - C . 7
.. 0.
 
(  -,
Patties to D9_sla,tc  (Carmen)
( Chicago, Rock I;~IcLnd and Pacific Railroad Com-any
 
,r
Dispute: ·,C la 
m 
01;__ 
1'.~--,~1oT;% a `,.-
,<> 
'p° ~'_`'-t ~' " °' ~ Carrier improperly :PeWn
(1) 'Ilnat r~.r'~..;_._.r 
the c:u. 
.G _ ,;,r~er::
. ....,·~` t_ , the ~,~ :.~ _lit
the 
use cf other thin Cv,r::,e,r (''vii_'Iz,,wLkoe Tra3n 
Crows ) to ,perfor.:z
Cax't?'-'·:.'?'t.`.; work ^f 
C;MpL1L;s 
inspecting aad testing 
vlEu7r brake
sy stc.s al train ;. ;ZO at ?lco1, Iowa on April 
6, 1977.
That accordingly 
ti:2 
Carrier 
'-:C: 
ordered '.o 
CG:ay.nSC.te: Ca1.s'_'_-1I:1
P. 0. Stone for 2 2/5 hours Puy at the time and ono half rate.
Flndi2l-
`I'ilE: Second KNI::'?.iO'! 
O''.' 
the AGj'.Si:mo11h Board, .t:'ut.l the wholn record and
all the evidence, _. .u:z,a
11(, 
carrier 
'~11_°~:,
· '"'? n~:-. employes 
111'`,i'OOn 
7_n this.
 
;.^carrier 
or 
carriers 
and and ) the 
C:':f: 
Xr~? 
G 
,~,. 
r . dispute 
are 
respectively carrier 
and 
E"-.'.,,1f%yE-: 
within 
the ;neat 
fng 
oT the
Rail-,,.-ay 1-, abO::' Act .`',S ny Ja.'O'vrr'. Tune 21'li1:iS I)7_v1.S''_C,:1 af the I.':i.jll'GIi_rYlt Tl;e:.':-t has jur:i_K1Ct1.an oven the dispabe
involved herein.
Parties to said dispiitc waived right of appearance at hearing thereon.
This dis-u_ ate alleges that the Carrier violated the Agreement ;hen
~.
other than CaY^_:'.°t1 (I'·ia~.i'1"3.',~lieC'. i'x'v=.1x; CrE31'iS J coupled air hose, 11'12pc^'f'~>f'd and
tested. air brake s;-teznu or'.. 'l,s:w,in Wo. 34E0 at Eldon, Iowa on April 6, 1
;y'7.
 
Carrier defends the claim on the allcz:,a,tivn that it had no control
of the work. Tt cites a Joint Trackage Hig.Ws Agrcenr:ent  permitted
the Chicago, Milwaukee, St.. Peal and Pacific Railroad Company (The VUlvaukee)
to use Carrier's facilities for an agreed upon fee. The joint hind
Agreement covers trackage as follows:
"Rock island's !:':-':.L'! 11 track between the V7(, Ste r ly limits Of
Roe?= island's test Davenport Ic Culver line eased by the
,_
I·iz 1 ;,~,m_~e:: at Mile Post 2:C 1..6 located at Culver, :COV;w, and
1WC:K IslAnd-M-1-livarAice joint truckage at Palo, Missouri,
located at Rock island's Mile _t'C?St 1-l-U042. Said v:W:.C=:CE' ;`-'
shall be deemed to . nclur.Iu r,17_ sidings, , ig;Lws y interlocking devices, CG:LLC7:":(1Ct lines, C`,t1Cj. oil other
facilities appurtenant thereto.''
Form 1
Page 2
Ae';.`-.LK'd 140e 
(793
Docket No. 
7`(a?6-T
--Ci,a&~Y-Cm-"(9
The AJTrecrlewL. contai.ns the fvU_onrinn px'ov:lsuor,s:
"Should any travzl5 locvl~)ovive or car of either pa,rty hereto
be derailed or damaged while on any portion of the joint
Line the sa:lt:e shall be picked up 
and/or removed without
unnecessary dc:Is;,,: 
'v>y 
Hoch island and the expense : o incurred.
shall be borne by the parties hereto in accordance with
provisions O1 Mc-h:1.0'fl .I..5 hereof, pr 
Ov.IC1':.C%.J 
. however, that tle
-G'YI:~';'1~1 , Of 
i:j"~? 
,y'.,..~c 
·1-rC:.i l 1'r i:n'2^`t:'.i.':u?'.`.:.i 
uo ~'i-_, ,.,'i ~ _!..CCO==":
.,^y__
 
. :.,.._.__ .._._._,._.-._a _. _ .._~  _ _. _ _..-.<... .,.. T
~T _.... _ .,.j_
. 
`: y ~~  ~C) 
V
Tri`v%__ ...'r''Car~  :i 
~1'a1;~t v'tl 
i'-.._ 
C~.~  _..._._.-..rY` _
i~11_f_1~,.~.~),'.c' '"!!uL',r 
set 
out bad order 
('.c',y".S C%t! 
any 
i;.1ri7.i~ _I:_T_.F'.rv'lW='·.C.~>
 
__ .,.,. .,._  
_. _ -  _  ,_,  C _e_ _,diligence 
r_ ~ ~ 7
 
~ _ - ·]'C .._f' 
fTiYl 
s~: bt1'1._
.~Y'O\,'`L.t_ . ~,L 
l'v ' %..- ~i
.>_..v'-'~.?]~.._.. 
,->1 i: 
_.. 
.._ l'-~.:c, .  W
out 
:·uei1 
CF,r;. SC' C'.;, 
t>J maintain 
lltl:i.:(ip3.:i rG'X 
train operation
Off,"CW' 
the Joint Line, Car:_ 
st1::.1.! 
not bi'. sCt out on, 'c.`;'c 
Ci;.S
used to ' pass t:,. a._ __,, when othcr tracks are available and the
C2 Y'?: 'r 
be 
f:::..o-C.'~l,. -f.O'T8d 
ti> such 
other 
t'r_'.;.ChS. l_~';L~ s'`_,i11x~CG_'
 
i>>> i ! 1
_o,'1'·,ir 
,cl.,°1a 
['.' 
1'.Y1 
Such 
Ind 
O& 
_  __.___. . ~.__ __.__ _. ,_._ - _ __ _,·_ 
~_._ 
__ - ~r ` ._ -_ · ~j~-Y41y
d';_ r.,. ... ~  ,.__"L C:~ h`,~  a.'r,'E ,~_ a L_A~ 111: ,...,. m_ ; ..CL.. , .r'. _
,_
paY'a?,g!r~p'i1, the Ci' . ; 1'!,`13:... "1. ·i r-An .,C;'[,C;..i~ will I1C:'1,11>. V e
Rack is1'·.'.1;CL dispatcher of ~,);_ .LOCu,'li7 Cil ...,t1d rl'iL_ e? co.' C:.--,~.'S
,r
set O';I'i_ ~ !_~:fi,,~i1C;.~:i S a,,ddE'rJ
Joint ~'L _'..;::`·'. gc' Agreements have prevailed ?.n the Railroad 
industry
d,Z1:':O~>'t`~ "r-ci it.`. COriCEu'.;:.iCvil and are authorized b,?r the In'`irez:;'G':..TE' CO'Y:."_:i'C.°
1. r, r  y.
CO?;n:isSiVil. This Board 1'=:-'.c .t_0 ng held that the ,~;yWt=;:-ent, unless S.~ 1.:L'.CC:,..__
SO providing, contains 110 '!"eNiI1Cti0'^ aZQnS't the `_::a_r::Lr1t:of 30inT l_'Y'2G`. _f9g1'i::E.'`?o:tS. 1'1,^_, stated in 0:.1x' !':-,rai'':1. 1 hLns "if we 'S'Tc:.'L t0 place CL restriction
on such joint track use .~<iv:;..'.ii,nt9 we would be Ming a provision to th_.:
-; , ~  _
Agreement. V;e 
haue no authority 
to ao so.
We find that the 
work h^re involved 
would be subject to the Agreement
or A~',1'< f?t:1Pnts between the ~i~.~_~td.~ui>l:C~ I:(Jti.ii and its C
'YPp2C5YeS. 
The Carrier has
no control of the work in this instance and. the 
Agreement with its e:.y;l.oyes
:i s not app19 c:: bW.v .
Second Division Awa.nca.s (1169 and 674? dead. with like issuer and x'ea.c`>
the 
sa.-me conclusion.
Claim denied.
A W A R L
NATIONAL RAZLnO!~1> ADJUSTi~11-:m~`.C T;O1^>.P~D
By Order of Second Division
Attest: Fxecu-tive Secretary
Ta~i,ao:1:~1 Railroad. Adjtlst^:e:It_:hoaz^d
_  3
li.~ ·.'::),M":Lf, ~~1'.~S C`. ti ^~A o"i1 U i_,_.mt:'il·a ~:,f'`._...~.'~;:~._S `u',T
Dated ~'G~,~;ILiC ,~()~ ,.L~.1..1.20~.~ ~i.Cl~`.3 ~+`ti.~ C1;:L",j C1 c7·,:-11.i;J.L'~1'S 19'j`1.