Fo3.~n 1 NATIONAL P,AILaRO)AD ADJUS7"-'ft._:'7 BOA-1-J)  Award No, 
',78:1.8
 
SI;uOiuD D:L'VI;3IG_i Docket 
iro. 'j'TG6
   
2-B1,rI-},,~'T_ 
'79
The Second. Division consisted of the regular nekbers and in
addition Referee ,.,_ 
I:r 
a 
rit 
T:. I:`a..:r, 
Jr. 
;; ter1 am~ra,rCz s"a:.s tendered.
( Sys'te?,u Federation Xo. 
7, 
LZaiis'ra.y f,my7:Loyes'
( DepaktanoYxt, A. F. of L. -  C. I. 0.
Parties 
t0 
1)iscnz'te: ( (:~1ec'L~'.c='.I '_o;eliexs) `
,_._....~ 
_~..V____~_.___.._.:._
( ~':z~':! :i_n_;iiail ~:';o1'tx1e~'n 
:Ca1O..
D7_S17U.'te: 
C.LE.j;:2 of 
~'il'.r;~.C;iC:S:
Z. `.I'1::1t in 
V1G`a_~.~Li_O'_1 
of 
ti,n 
C-u2'y'eP't Crew 
1irlexman
 
Trainee D. _. 1,_
. t _.~ unjustly 
Maimed 
:f.'x'aYn the service of
__:a`_.;,G_ 
~~,,~.., ,
Burlington ~ .Oi:' 
laiE,i~Yl 
:LY1C . ;, 011 
J7~.:':i: ~ ~ o 
1.9`l7.
That 
2.CCa='d.'1;;_y'ti'1C' B'.':.'l3_):1·'tCI1 
Northern 
MC., 
be ordered to
return Crew UYic'Iaan 
`1''1'-~:.~:LLCn 
L. . `i_::u__:.E.'n 
'GEC 
its' service, that
the record of : l:i`.reSta.F:atil::"1 ai);j. dismissal be rcvnved
from .CiY'. 
'n. 
_....w. u.;E:r,1cc:ciR. ';1.K he bo cm pensat;e:ci. for :ail.
t7.Iae: 
lost,, 
._:1 :..,M_'tn:'_.i.%i2~"tio . ..siiU~"'
.wt'-oia of my 
1.C.i.`.,`u 
seniority,
 
vacation vacation 
_1_,e'f 
a?' Sic::. days, hoop! tali 
2C1'i;:  a.1
vacation vacation 
tine, 
lost 
'l~r;;~t, 
.... _ ,; , ., ~,
benefits; 
_.<`~.~:L.H::.._.L .';R,_._,...~i:i.LO :'~.'i~f~_..._~e~.. 'aL1;:. ~.:~,~r 
f.·'rl'_^^.~ Y'iE~Itsi
privileges 
r a1' 
benefits to which 
Y' 
.. Je entitled under
~ ~i:'...iaL'::~.i~".,
~·'tJ.~_t'.Sor !a-,,,,o.
Findings:
The 
Second 
I):i.visiaal of the AdjlzstmeI1't Doaxd, upon tho -wliole record and
,_
all 
the 
evidence, fends that:
The canz':i_ex or v:zvr. iers and the eAy~loy: or ~ ~'~c~loljes involved in 
cha.s
dispute 
are 
L':. 3pE'Ci;';vC''L',,' 
carrier and 
t,:TlUz:G 
';,`i'th:1.11 the 
I.W 
.at11ng of the
Railway 
Lobar: 
respectively as approved June <_'1_, 
1934.
This 
Division 
of 
the 
Adjustment 
Board 
has 
jurisdiction over the dispute
involved herein.
Parties 
to 
said 
dispu'i;e 
-~',a.ived r-ignt of appearance 
at hearing thereon.
 
Cla7x:!as1t Yv%~.S da Y''?CUCd. to attend an ?n'I;_,.i'i;'t,_'2'.1: iOa "for the :ya_Y'Vt?;u? 'al
a:pCeY''tw!-Y?:1.I``" facts and dc'G::L'Y:1:LY':LYlZ your ~'i~:;,)~.'i:·_,_L)~ ~..'~.'t~, .._n not rep0:·`."t:., ' to
. _
M1. 11. T,,e Tea:"iT,.'st- at Bl'c:,7it.u·'-,'d, i`::L21'E'.sGtc`:., .:'.S 1:;.a"'.iL't1C_'.tCd 7.11 I:iy /Asst. Di,1'eE'.i.J:
Ca.:iman:ica'tiai;s/'JZ.etter to you cf VA y 12, 1j`'?''.
 
Investigation ~ ~ a7 e.red YI.I_'lrhO7 nt a xerne: enta.--
 
W:~. My ' held, ''..., and ~'.!3.YiG ~.,Zi~.:L:
t:i.ve of the organization
.
 
2aLlOT1"r; the .~t~l'crf~', ,'~..~ci~:! :)n, aa June c~?, 1977, C ~.~=,:~?'n:·?2'G YTaS d1I..-!-S SGd
fr011 SEXViCE "for V1.01°a7.On of .1'tUlF:w `102 ,tna '('~i'._=`.''n) O.'-' -,:,he E.-ales of 't:1C
I:rt,W ntenance of V;~ar Dip? :°1?:,Cx:, Ferri (~= '~'- (1." f'.fiSi:'1't:1?I<: yOU,CSEZf from) fLLy
_.~1..._~;
Form 1  Award No. 
7818
Page 2 Doel:.e-G No. 
7796
  
2--BTi:I:-wJ-'79
without aathox:ity, and- by not ca:ipl.yinJ 
T';itTl 
instl'ucL:i_Gns fxo:ra 
the, proper
authox3_'cy as a re su_? t of your not xepor't-ia~ < . . on 
i:a:y 15, a 
9 I"('~ .
The 
Organization 
vaults the procedu!'e followed by the Ca).-rier en two
counts:
l_o 
Claimant vas not represented by the Organization at the 
hearing,,
nor vas a sped-.yc .rau'i;~r 1:~d.~ o'=' ha_z at the hear:in., as to 
v;a:tr.;X' 
he
wished s'u_eh xe.c;xese:-utw'rien.
2. The notice of made no Eiention of Pules '(02 and
7G2(h), 
although reference to t;l'.:_.. 
1:`3,S ._*ci,:)_G 
1n the 
Y!: ,_':i_Y1aY?d 
reliance 
Ot:'i',=._=:;_
was made in the notice of dinnissal.
-Rule 30(c) J)"rovides as follows:
,
Za`_'aCa .('~1.:tre 
(]r) 
ClaY.~, .` advance written notice 01 the
:L11VG''S'G .. F-at ~_C7'1 
shall 
!-:t'.'. 
t;iVci1 
the 
E:?` T?_!.O~Ji,L' 
and the a,y_'_7';)T'::"atC:
local 
O ';;C,Ii.~;~:.'~;.CII. 
1:'e;x'e 
Setl.ta-G:L-: 
a, ''?_.a 
O1'C~;._ 
tl~.=·.u 
the 
E'.~ . ,_O~
..c:c
:a'<xy `c'.f~'c..'.1,''; 
for 
rCJ 
U?'c'_ s.2`ad.'G7 v; 
:1 
t-'s,' <%. 
M,`1' ..;ist'.hOf7L'.C.'Ci 
x _. = `=..entat-LVC_ and :ic?' presence of neCi.'s,`.' '_lyj 
T,',''!..tYiC:.`-.':>eS l,:`'.'. 1:. 
dt.H,.. 
_.`C.
The notice 
%7-is-t 
specify the Margo for ?,'._:LCil 
:inV GS'v'!g1.ewp,1
tt
1S b0?_`1 
; held.''
, . r n
The notice of 1.n1%'.`''.StJ.gc~7.On also advised the ~ 7..a1:t''.a:1-1- 
v O'1' 
his 
rights
to xeprc':r.,ta.tion, and the Organization received a coY of the notice. !''^!.e
Board r 
the , . Carrier is not ia violstion of the applicable rule Y
fplCc.'t.~_t_:.. rule 1Y:
f'ail_iW:; to do more than inquire of 
the 
C.-! a.__,.ant at the hearing if he had
a representative; the rule calls for no more than this.
As to reference to rules in the hearing and in the dismissal notice,
the xwl:.°s cited are as follovL, in part:
Rule 702: "i..npl.o;Tes nust roport for duty at the
.
de:;a.gn_vte;i ti:::e and .1.1 ace. ,
): 
tn'r::1Jl.0yE:S 
must 
C:O:?'!7l,`yr 
with instructions
  
S  
...
 
from the proper authority."
the Board f7I?dS the citation of the. rules of ermloye conduct entirely
in consonance ii.L'Gtl the specific charge _.. the notice of 
:i.11VC':ut1`a..`i.i011.
-.
the cited 
x1'lC'-S' Z7°fE fO:C `C.~.eil.`iC:S :i.1_i__C'xci>:i 
from those 
cited 
in the notice,
the organization, have -1r_. 'ro,,i.nd 
^'.1 
which tO 
GbyjPC'G. 
Any 
1'fa.,:.3tlu.`~TC.'
reading -<._.zat:i_Otl. 
~^~O
 
-a 
cited ~  shows, however, 
~-`n Nt 
they 
c`1.2°-l..' 
d1rcv:Gl_T% 
On 
paint
.reading 
O- 
the 
Y'_..f:S 
,"~f 'i.._  
...
to the na'~ure of ti?e offense o:_' which the Clai_natzt vi-as told he would be
j.1:VGSt:izatC::3. Ms &':W 
'_'?SC: 'PT.-.15 
not, impaired 
111:df1' 
these 
C:i_rCi)a'!Sta:'1CC:n_ 
a'.'?.;.~
the Bound finds n0 
pi."C~C::Lut' 
al  irregularity.
I'' 
OxMri 
1
Pale 
3
Award 
1v0. 
·( 8~..J
"
Docket :'.a. 
1790
A5 to the 
merits 
of the is:·.'ac_., the C1.wi.·r·..nt freely c:,(-1-v:itted 
ta..,;.t 
he
did not 
x'E~:,,r~f: fo?" aorlk on the 
0'-4.te 
and 1.t1 thn manner indicated. 'J'a,vn by
itself, 
tl,__. 
-Board 
z';oiz'!.e"_ find no reason to disturb 
the Carrier's disciplinary
action. In 
t~=as 
instance, there .~.;e c~ rw~_~:~1;~.,~ce' which .:.it_gate 'Ll_t~' ~;?'avi_ty
 
_..~ 
, t y,. , , .n.~
Uf the offense. ThC record shows that the 
C'_l,.LCB.I'lt 
v,-a> . suffering 
1:r'r'."I_'c`L,
psychological 
d0;,'JY'P;;;" X0:1, 
as evidenced by letters from his doctor. 
Ve 
vas
going th,tUut,h 
~'B.CLLCYi'.:~:;C_',~r 
.. :'OCGCdi_ 
;:8. 
i''u:x'1..-.', and 
4?:!'~1.~7,C17'ii L'e~e3,l;d 
t0 
'F?L1C'?'E
the 
,Y'eu~_I~iJ'_l:.a_l..`1.~_1.~;r 
.t.._. . h;^ 
:r"-.-t.t'i 
th_ 
sGllyiaC'.C, 
(''·._ c- first
without 
fJf-'C1'::f'!_'v 
of 
C.':'e;','1CnC'-ed <,,i%i:::i:'.:`1CE.' uf'.<::':`v.'.:L.'1. 
No record of prcYous
disciplinary action w .... introducej, Mile the hearing officer cannot be
expected to be 
E:'.t?:...1' 
a medical expert or a 
i'-., n:'.i1Cial 
expert, these factors
are nevertheless zro ru'vy of can; id,-.rat ion.
 
.,_
Under ~l,e c1 , nu. e;;es, c_.hcaid will therefore find the penalty of
d7r1155eL 
_.::;'',C',' ;  1t
 
~t0;XaGC c.:t1 
1'l1:jL.;2t' ln 
?:2ulGT. 
HC 
TCil3:Ct'. 
1117Ch 
will be ordered, 
1C:'vCY, 
is subject to :Clhi_a.,fLl!I:;: 
t1 
the
Carrier medical assurnnce, that he is able to resume his full 
duties.
Claim sustained to the extent that the Clainant shall be reinstated to
d?oty with 
S8Y17-o=_.'(:, L'i = _:GC 
2ni:'', 
red but 'ot1CLG 
L°G!( y or 
ptlc?1CtYaaCi?V: 
bGlOi~it: , sWbject 
to 
the condition as indicated in the Findings.
1`Tn:=0..PJJ H&Wl OA-T-) EsT0;'.' 
Till 
~~`':u'7'1-~TL P)sli.TD
By Order of Second Division
Attest: 
Executive Secretary
 
1:wt:ionw:L Railroad i",djustnient 
Board
l~a;·'J -- ~ !Ji
.'l3.iJ·C-I _~- 
.'1L L 
:i:nnistrnnve Assistant
Dated 
at 
f Chicago, Illinois, t':u..s -!-Oth day of janua.ry, 107Q.