Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTPEIVT BOARD Award
NO.
`I81+4
SECOND DIVISION Docket No.
773
2-C&MrT-CPI-'
79
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Herbert, L. Marx, Jr. when aTrrard was rendered.
( System Federation No.
76,
Railway F~nployes'
( Department, A, F. of L.
Parties to Dispute: (Carmen)
(
( Chicago and North Veste,rn Transportation Company
Dispute: ,Clairl of F,m_ployes
1. Car Inspector John A. Pille.r. , Butler, j^7isconsin, was unjustly
dismissed
from
service on March 28,
177.
2. Car Inspector John A. P:i11er was erroneously charged wl.th failure
to comply with instructions from trainmasl;e~.^.
3.
That the Chicago and T:orth Western Trans no rt at- ion Comparrr be
ordered to reinstate Car Inspector John A. :Piller with his senioritY
unimpaired, ,re:i.mburse him for all vacation rights, hc:allch and
welfare and insurance benefits, and x,11 benefits tie Vr'ol?..Ld have beer
entitled to had he not been un~ustly dismissed, as pet I-;ule
35.
F:i.nd.in~,s
The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and
all the evidence, rinds that:
The carrier of carx° i-.ers and the employe or employes involved in this
dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the
Railway Labor Act as alrproved June 21' 101134.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute
involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing thereon.
Claimant was charged with
"failure
to comply with instructions from
Txa9_nrnastei T-7. T. Lundell when you were in >txwcted to provide yourself and
wear a bump hat at Butler Yard while assigned as Car inspector."
A properly conducted investigation was held, at vrhiclu time it was
testified that ^1raitnaster Lundell, during the week of March 1,
1977,
noticed that claimant was not wearing his yellcz,r btunp hat. lie advised the
claimant that he should put on his bump hat and wear. it while pe,rf ormirg
Carmen duties. Ap, ro=LLmately one wo.eli later Lundell a;;ain noticed that
claimant was not wearing his bump hat. The above noted charge ;resulted.
Foam 1 Award
No. 780
Page 2 Rocket No.
7783
2-C&1VW-CM-'
79
Claimant testified that the bump hat issued to him was broken. Ile
further stated that he forgot about the subject. He did not talk to the
foreman on duty about a
bLU?rp
hat but acknowledged that he should hove.
Claimant further acknowledged that he did not wear a bwn.p hat during
the week in question bwt was able to secure one after being approached by
Tras_rnnaste,r Lundell. on the second occasion.
While claimant's prior discipline record is far from exeriplaxy, the
Board finds that dismissal from service is excessive in these circumstances.
The Board irill restore claimant to service with service rights unimpaired but
without pay fox lost wages.
In granting clairrarTc this e,ppol.Ttunity, it :is antici.patcd that the
claimant will- have learned -f.he over.rid.5.iy necessity of complying with
work-r elated inst:.~u.ct:i.csrls and that failure to do so again may yell result
in dismissal from service.
A V A R D
Claim sustained to the extent set forth in Findings.
rLIMOiTAL RA:iLROAD ADM T'z.i
~Lv'f
BOARD
By Order of Second Division
Attest: Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Boavd
~,_~
.~..A
.--°' <t.~ ~
F
w~°`~ ~ ~s
.~4f
4i
:.h, m". '
,7 .~ ,~
~ L ~ r
·'A .4' .6
IiO~E.''.Tia.Y.':i_e
`BxasCh - AdG1.C'aiSt:C3,t1V<: AsS1.StaL;t
Dated
a1t
Chicago, Illinois, this 7th day of Febmaxy,
1979.