Foam 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 7860
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 7693
2-MKCSJA-Cm-'79





Parties to Dispute: ( (Carmen)




Dispute: Claim of Employes:





F :i Ildl i'1<F; S

The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employe ox employes involved in this dispute axe respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.



This claim disputes Carrier's discharge of Claimant for his violation of Carrier's Rrzle 7, which ,prohibits the use of alcoholic beverages, intoxicants or narcotics by employes subject to duty or i n possession or using such substances while on duty.

There 9_s more than substantial evidence indicating that Claimant was guilty as charged. Su.^,maa.rily, it shows that three (3) .hint bottles of -whiskey were found in Claimant's possession in his lockers. He also freely
Form 1 Page 2

Award No. 7860
Docket No. 7693
2-NZCSJA-CM-' 79

admitted to "nipping" one or two shots of whiskey per day, with his morning coffee, to help his cough and to clear the phlegm out of his throat. While some doctors or medieval medicine men might _prescrib2 such tonic to alleviate symptoms and illnesses such as the Claimant alleged that he had, it is clearly in violation of Carrier's rules and we conclude that Carrier was justified in taking the disciplinary action it did.

Considering the discharge invoked by the Carrier, we note that Claimant had twenty-.seven .plus years of service with the Carrier and was just a few years away from r. etirerrent when he was discharged. We think that Claimant has now had a few years to consider the seriousness of his action and will thus reinstate him, but without, pay for tipne lost. In so do! n,(Y, we warn the claimant that for whatever reasons or motives, the use or .possession of alcoholic beverages is a serious violation of cornpanv rules. Thus, he is going to have to find another cure for leis cough. We also suspect that Claimant may have a drinking .problem, and we admonish hire to analyze his situation very objecti-vrely and seriously, for if he does have such a problem, he should seek Professional assistance to cure it. The next time he gets himself into trouble lid>e this, the Carrier would be perfectly justified in ,permanently terminating his relationship, and this Board would not look so kindly on a request for reinstateament.

A W A R D

Claire sustained to the extent indicated.

NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTIPTNT BOARD

By ^rder of Second Division


Attest: Executive Secretary








Dated ~t Chicago, Illinois, this 28th day of February, 1979.