Form 1 NATIONAL '3A rLROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 8044
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 7873
2-SCL-CM-'79





Parties to Dispute: ( (Carmen)



Dispute: Claim of Er~ployes:





Findings:

The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that;

The carrier or carriers and the employe or employer involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and onploye within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved Tune 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.



Claimant reported for wror::-, on November 22, 1976 two and one-half (22) hours late and was denied the right to work his position. The Carrier had called a man to work Claimant's -position. The Claimant maintains that he called his foreman and advised him that it would be 5:00 PM or 5:30 Prd before he could report rather than his 3:00 PM starting time, at which time the foreman advised him that the late starting time would be acceptable. The Carrier denies that arty approval was given claimant to commence work late on the date in question. aecause Claimant was not permitted to work on November 22, 1970, he did not qualify for holiday pay on November 25, 1976 for which pay he also makes claim.

We are unable to find any contractual support for claimant's position. Claimant does not have the right to set his own working hours. See Award 7551 between the same parties. Further, the claimant has failed to prove that permission was granted for him to couBnence work 22 hours late,


Form 1 Award No. 804+
Page 2 Docket No. 7873
2-SCZ-CM-' 79



    Claim denied.


                          NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMM BOARD

                          By order of Second Division


Attest: Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board

    _ ____ - _-:______~ ~ .. _ _ :~ ~ i


    ...-Rosmar:i.e Bxasch -. Administrative Assistant


Dated at~-Chz.cago, Illinois, th:Ls 15th day of August, 1979.