Form 1 NATIOIuAL RAILROAD AT;~,'r'~T,;T!~ MaRD Award No. 8727
SECOITD DDTI'ION Docket -1To. 8001
2-SI-T-CM-' 79
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Herbert L. Marx, Jr. when award was rendered.
System Federation ITO. 162, Railway Employes'
Department, A. F. of L. C. I. 0.
Parties to Dispute:
( (Carnen)
( Southern Pacific Transportation Company
Dispute: Claim of Emnloyes
1. That the Southern Pacific Trans^ortation Company (Texas and
Louisiana Lines) violated the controlling agreement, particularly
Rules 117 and 29 when Car Foreman, C. R. Daniels assigned himself
to perform camen mechanic's work on llay 1,
1976,
Houston, Texas.
2. That accordinn;ly, IQ-lie Southern Pacific T,ansportwtion Conpary
(Texas and Louisiana Lines) be ordered to compensate Cariawn
0. Jac oDS in "as _ount of a°4t;ht hours (8') at overt--- rate
for I_ y 1
0
a
s
he.
- ,z , r-
,,s - I
C
ry-
.'a, , 176,
.~ _:Hs
available to r~er=o_:~ this cam ~;o
Findin7,s:
The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and
all the evidence, finds that
The carrier or carriers and the
enpl
oye or employes involved in thi s
dispute are r espectiv=ah,T carrier and er:Plo-; a Within the rneaninrl of the
Rai li~,-ay Labor Act as approved June
21,
..'1--J~ji.
This Division of the Adjustment Boas°d ha.3 jurisdiction over the dispute
involved herein.
Parties to said disrnzte waived right of appearance at hearing thereon.
The instant clafun alleges that Car r-1 er assi F;?zed Car For--:,[ ?..n C. Ro
Daniels to perforitl inspection ;nor;; on f reight cars on Eay 1,
19-76
at Houston.,
Texas. The claim alleeu that a car inspector (Carnan) inspected one side
of the string of frei;;la't ears ;.rlii,le the Car Fore::.-^.,n cerfom:ed the identical
work on the opposite side of ti-ie car.
Carrier alleges that no i us pact on ~:~s involved: that the Car Forew,~.:n
merely recorded the repairs needed and cc_,piled a Lwitci list in order t-wt
the .~rs could be elac~d on t~e proper trwc'Ks for re^airs. C y,rri er fut°tl:er
c~ _. ~l~ _ > _
allege-, that the cars ho.d prey, i ous..',y been inspected by Car. Inspectors.
Form 1
Page 2
Award I~;o.
8127
Docket No.
8001-T
2-SPr-CM-
t
79
Notwithstanding thos-
i 1 <:,,rations, Carrier further avows that:
"Even if the for--,, '·j''re inspecting cars, vhich ',,re deny
in this instant, · . -inspection of cars is not work
exclusively re,--
Il
, to i°`emors of the .. . (Cam. en's )
Craft by either r-I-Ice or agreement."
To this the Board
dc,-,
r-t.
arro'e.
S"Te
have long held that inspection of
freight and passenger ca?':~
r
i:orr~-=`acted to Car·:en under rules such as
Rule
11.7
here governing.- ;-'=coma Division Award i,tos.
3687, 4414, 5632,
5953
and
7594.
The Organization
st~.f -.rr I1,at
the prior inspection alleged by Carrier
was actually a roll-by ir-:..
,. i ion
and the ::=e thoy ouch inspection is then
made by the Car Foreman
·a.r
r
i ' I
r : lead
inspector. 'the Organization acknowledges
that this nraetice has
b-.r.r,
:~ r:,C-fect for a long period of time.
This Board holds to
pertinent -where
w
i°u1e
s.;~
change the clear p:~ov-1si.~.r
361.6, 6438
and
6594,
However, it is notwaS merely
CU?':lr~il~n=~'~
ini't_,,
he was actually
`lT! S
-c='
C t.!,
i 1:
tiOn. If he was
CC::'.i?il ip.
required (after inspLect-il'-,
for
In 8.hi.1~'; ~ e!'Jai
r c,
If he vas inmectay; i'o:' r'
sufficient eviO.ence to -ii
for lack of evidence.
Clain dismissed.
Attest: Executive Secr-v
w
PTational
Rw21ru -~ i
ix::v:ious findirs that practice is onlir
tr
:Lr
and s:z:.r~a.F;uous:
t':u:.v,
a -oract:i_ce cannot
)''1-1C.'.
St?=
u-CG:'ld ~~:'1_S-,U:1 Ai~T'c1;Gi1:> -!GS,
Lo 'ci?:`.^ Board
~-t'>.~a},
~~ Car
77or
~-:::an Daniels
i W:1
on dt?fc,C`G
S ~:_^eV7.U1,1S.1.~,T
dt°L:an:'-d
U1.' i~it1C'ti~!'~'
y,if:~.1i::~.t:ac;.?
G.Fea:C:L_'tJ_ c,_:'i:~:;l.'
tile
r0~-~3j' ins
^C
. n :?
.,.C1T.
.C:1
Or
~V;=.~_l4'w
~~.'.1::~
iv
U
n^
tW1
a
o--
re-,a
4= s
r; ..I^.._n) t0
detL':.:ni!"1-~- t,ie ::?et:?Gd or location, ~::L1'.'1:1~` E:1'i. a.J_ f
ti:1Cti Gu, ~1'y:·e is no
v-T.o'! au1.0I'a.
, : L., ~ 'i,hore 't:"'-''...5 a viola' -- onn. -'-here 7.S not
~, iL ;:onelt?lion, and %,Te ,W11. dis---~ss the claim
A W !? R D
~;ATIO11L4h i?A=OA:D ADR7USi7,...~1'?' BOt~F,D
By Order of Second Division
iji.if,tment Board
By
Dated at Chicago, I1Li.no' -.
27th day of Iepte:;ner, 179.