Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 8138
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 7711-I
2-NRPC-1-179



( Daniel Solak, Electrician ( Parties to Dispute:




Dispute : Claim of Emoloyes



Findings:

The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employe within the waning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.



The Claimant herein contends that he was repairing his car on September 5, 1977, such repairs being effected at 9:15 p.m., when he was observed by his foreman and told to return to work. Later that evening, he was issued an "Employee Warning" by his supervisor. The following day, Septeoher 6, 1977, he was advised he was removed from service. The record shows the grievant, having been hired on August 1, 1977, was still in his probationary period; according to the ~arrier, he had an unacceptable attitude toward his work. The record also indicates the grievant's lunch period fell between 7:00 and 8:00 p.m.; the grievant claimed he was performing such repairs during his lunch period. By date of September 7, 1977 -- the day after his removal -the grievant signed and submitted a resignation:


Form 1 Award No. $13$
Docket No. 7711--I
2-NRPC-I-'79

By letter of November 1, 1977, the Claimant informed the Board of his intent to raise a dispute relative to his departure from the Carrier.

This claim fails on several points, including the Claimant's failure to raise this matter on the property as required by the Act, as well as his expressed intent of disassociating himself by resignation; additionally it is the well-established right of the Carrier to act sua sponte relative to an employee's retention based on its assessment of probationary employees. Additionally, the record of the event which led to his removal -- the repair of his car at a time when he was supposed to be at work and was under pay -raised a substantial question of the Claimant's interest in meeting the requirements of his position.






                              By Order of Second Division


Attest: Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board

By
      Rosemarie Brasch - Admlnlstrative Assistant


Dated t Chicago, Illinois, this 17th day of October, 1979.