Form 1 NATIONAL FAIMOAD ADJUST11;EUT BOARD Award No. 8150
SECOND DIVISION Docket Ho. 8070
2-IC G-CM-' 79





Parties to Dis~onzte· ( (Carmen)
(
( Illinois Central Gulf Railroad Company

Dis,pute ; Claim of 7-ILT)l2yes:











Findings:

The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the mealzing of the Railway Labor Act as appr owed June 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the disp'ate involved herein.



Claimants Roberson and Wicksell, cax:;ien in carrier's Mays yard i n iie,a Orleans, Louisiana, were dismissed from service for attempting, to steal ten new Good gear tires, which were part of an interstate shipment. They were observed transferring the tires fran a co:nrar~y truck to the personal ear of claimant Wicksell. The eye witness -to this transfer reported it to carrier's special agent, Faucheux. Investigation by the special agent uncovered the tires in claimant's car, pa.rr_ed on company properuy. Claimants Roberson and T~,Ticksell1 were subsequently cited for formal investigation to determine whether they were guilty. At the conclusion of the hearing, carrier dismissed both men. The organization protest:; carrier's actions, alleging that claimants were not guilty. It clairr-z that they were framed arid that they did not receive a fair and impartial investigation.
Form 1 Page 2

Mrard No. 8150
Docket ,,,To. 8070
2-TCG-CM-'79

From the record before it, this Board sees no facts that support the organization's -position. Claimants Wieksell and Roberson did load ten tires into Wicksel I 's pr:i.vate ear. Snvest,it~ators did discover these tires in the car. At the hearing, clairants could not explain away these .acts. Clainant Wicksel3_ argued that he intended to turn the tires into the office. No one would listen to him, ho~JrevrL. Further, the office eras locked, since it was Sunday.

Carrier gave no credence to the contention that claimant intended to turn the tires into the office, nor does the record support such a claim. Carrier concluded that cl~ia.nts intended to steal the ten tires. From a review of the records, this :Board concludes that carrier's decision was based on substantial evidence. We see no reason to believe othererise.

We cannot support the organization's contention that carrier framed claimants, nor ca,rl ie believe that clair__vnts did not receive a fall and fair hearing. Clai:-iants and their representatives had every onportun-I ty to call witnesses and to exaynine and cross-exa4m:i.ne them at the.-hearinT. There is substantial evidence in the record before u;, to sun-Dort the chwrc°s levied by carrier. There is no evidence to show that dismissal of claL-nants was arbitrary or capricious. Consequently, the claim rust be denied.

A Z^T A R D

Claim denied.

Attest; Executive Secretary
National Railroad. Adjustment Board

NATTOT,AL RATLROAD ADJUSTTMI'TT BOARD

By Order of Second Division


By _



Dated lat Chicago, Zllino:is, this 24th day of October, 1979.