Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD AD,TUST7ENT BMRD Award No. 8163
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 7928
2-D&RGW-Ci:-' 'i9





Parties -to Dispute: ( (Carmen)
(
( Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad Company

Dispute: Claim of Emoloyes





Findings

The Second Division of the Ad just,-nent Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.



This claim is based on an alleged violation of Rule b(b) which claim resulted when on July 25, 1976 the carrier called one other than the claimant to perform overtime work.
Form 1 Award No. 8163
page 2 Docket No. 7928
2-D&RGN-CM-' 79

The claimant has taken the position that the carrier must follow the order of the overtime list when assigning overtime. We do not agree. A violation of Rule 8(b) can be made out only by a showing that overtime was not assigned "with the purpose in view of distributing the overtime equally". This requires more than was shovm in this case.






                          By Order of Second Division


Attest: Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board

By1..<..~ i ~'
`f1'osemarie Brasch - Administrative Assistant

Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 14th day of November, 1979.