Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD A?)JUST:._NT BCt^.RD Award No. 
8184
  
SECO,TD DIVISION Docket 
No. 70,41
  
2--rvT-&V- 
1 
79
The Second Division consisted of the regular rrembers and 
in
addition Referee Robert A. 
Franden 
when a;vard 
zvas rendered.
( System Federation No. 2, Railway Employes'
( Department, A. F. of 1:,. -  C. I. 0.
 
Parties to Dispute: 
( (Electrical t5'orkers)
 
(
 
( R.tissour i Pacific Railroad Comaany
Dispute Claim of Frrini ova;
1. That the Missouri Pacific Railroad Co:';r)any 
violat~,d Rules 25(a),
(b) and (c) of tune June 1, 1960 controlling a:-ream_,nt: Article
III of the Sc')-te:-~Cer 25, 
1064 
,%-,rreej-.reTvL 4"aen 
C'a, 
'-'icr 
c3.SSiF:'1F'd 
on
Friday, June 
24, 19'7^ bet:reen the hou-;,s of 4:00 P.m. to 12:00
midn-'Eht, Data Test 
Center En-:n~!er 
I). G. Milburg; 
asain on
Saturday, 
June 25, 197;' 
between tae hour.: of i:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.
Data 
Test 
Center 
Supervisor Zul, Data Test Center 
Coir,%~:.nications
Engineer Ytineelcr and D.ta 
C'`.._..:7_"11C.'1.~:t;. }:21!'"_"s^.. 
nr:aa'_!7 to T)°rfoim
teleT~licne iaaln'taiil.?rS' 
'~.oT'tC '',:1 .t1 
;,:::' t'::';;TJal anti 
1:i::'.%:.l~ui:? On 
of
IBM 3705 cables, be txeen the 
7th 
and 
~:,L(1 
floor in 
The', 
'.J'.SSnur1
Pacific Builuin-. St. L^uis, 
..:issouri, -~?~u.^.., dc·~ri·.r~nr~ C~..i:.::~nts
the provisions of the Agreements
.
2. That, accordino-ly, Carrier be ordered to co mensate Telepalone
Maintainers Stefania;> for Jty.e '?4, 19i-8 and Telerhjne ~`aintainers
Heise, Lerramaro and Leimu;u1h for June 25, 7_97'7, eight hours (8' )
each at the plinit.ve rate.
,Find i nj;~s ;,
The Second 
Division 
of the Adjustment Board, upon the 
;hole 
record and
all the evidence, finds that:
 
The carrier or carriers and tile eamloye or employes involved in this
n  r o.. -~  t n z ~,~ 'sue , n -o 
within are the TP-naning of the
 
Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 193+.
This Division of the Ad justment Bk.)ard has j?lrisdiction over the dispute
involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing thereon.
Form 1  Avv~ard "1o. 
8184
Page 2 Docket No. 7941
  
2-MP-E',y-' 79
This claim is 
based on the alleged 
improper use of 
supervisors
to do telephone maintainers' work in cc=eetion with an IB'A' 3705 
at
the Carrier's com.m`,:nications facili`~.y at St. Louis, Missouri.
Specifically i t is charged that supsrrisors r.erforr:i-ed maintainers'
work in h^lni=i, to 4n.S tall cables r'.L'Lninc?' b~ 
~',"''~Tt 
the Ii .'.! 3705 and
the Carrier's Data Test Center. The Carrier 1s.c: :,.:~_ed 
test 
super
visors performed any work reserved to the clai:-urn t.s .
We have 
thoroughly 
reviewed the record of tie handling on the
 
property and fall to find 
e 
thind- 
o  ?`snrtion_ 
rted
by evidenc..~  
r 
u 
u.~,:~unpo~ted
by evidence. The burden of proof rests on the claimants to show that
the supervisors p-erfor:nd work reserved to them. This they have 
not
done. Vie must deny the claim.
A 'r9 A It D
Claim 
denied.
r t, ~' l ; 1.1 '~'i TC 
rn.· tEA, 
T 
B, 
rf ~ TI i
NATIC.,1AL
 
LIv.::C°.~ .`.D~ ._>~.,_,.;~ ~.:_z~
By Order 
of 
'-~econd 
Divs 
-.on
Attest: ExecutiNe 
Secretary
 
National Railro~;c3 Adjustmnt Board
By, :°
f 
;Rosemaria Brasch - Adminis trs. t-1ve .«ss is tan -l';
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 28th day of November, 
1979.
114