Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD A?)JUST:._NT BCt^.RD Award No. 8184
SECO,TD DIVISION Docket No. 70,41
2--rvT-&V- 1 79





Parties to Dispute: ( (Electrical t5'orkers)
(
( R.tissour i Pacific Railroad Comaany

Dispute Claim of Frrini ova;






,Find i nj;~s ;,

The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the ;hole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and tile eamloye or employes involved in this
n r o.. -~ t n z ~,~ 'sue , n -o within are the TP-naning of the
Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 193+.

This Division of the Ad justment Bk.)ard has j?lrisdiction over the dispute involved herein.


Form 1 Avv~ard "1o. 8184
Page 2 Docket No. 7941
2-MP-E',y-' 79


to do telephone maintainers' work in cc=eetion with an IB'A' 3705 at
the Carrier's com.m`,:nications facili`~.y at St. Louis, Missouri.
Specifically i t is charged that supsrrisors r.erforr:i-ed maintainers'
work in h^lni=i, to 4n.S tall cables r'.L'Lninc?' b~ ~',"''~Tt the Ii .'.! 3705 and
the Carrier's Data Test Center. The Carrier 1s.c: :,.:~_ed test super
visors performed any work reserved to the clai:-urn t.s .


property and fall to find e thind- o ?`snrtion_ rted
by evidenc..~ r u u.~,:~unpo~ted
by evidence. The burden of proof rests on the claimants to show that
the supervisors p-erfor:nd work reserved to them. This they have not
done. Vie must deny the claim.



    Claim denied.


                            r t, ~' l ; 1.1 '~'i TC rn.· tEA, T B, rf ~ TI i

                        NATIC.,1AL

                          LIv.::C°.~ .`.D~ ._>~.,_,.;~ ~.:_z~

                          By Order of '-~econd Divs -.on


Attest: ExecutiNe Secretary
National Railro~;c3 Adjustmnt Board

By, :° f ;Rosemaria Brasch - Adminis trs. t-1ve .«ss is tan -l';

Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 28th day of November, 1979.

                      114