Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No.
8206
SECOND DIVISION Docket No.
8023
2-sPT-Ew-t79
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee George E. harney when award was rendered.
( System Federation No.
114,
Railway Employes'
( Department, A. F. of L. - C. I. 0.
Parties to Dispute: ( (Electrical Workers)
( Southern Pacific Transportation Company
Dispute: Claim of Employes:
1. That under the current Agreement, Mechanical Department Electrician
Richard Carrola was unjustly treated when he was dismissed from
service on August
23, 1977,
following investigation for alleged
v;iolatial of portions of Rule 810 of the General Rules and
Regulations of the Southern Pacific Transportation Company from
may 1, 1977,
to July
15, 1977.
2. That accordingly, the Carrier be ordered to:
(a) Restore the aforesaid employe to service, with all service and
seniority rights unimpaired, compensate him for all time lost and
with payment of
6°%
interest added thereto.
i
(b) Pay employe's'group medical insurance contributions, including
group medical disability, dental, dependent's hospital, surgical
and medical, and death benefit premiums for all time that the
aforesaid employe is held out of service.
(c) Reinstate all vacation rights to the aforesaid employe.
Findings i
I
The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and
all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this
dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the
Railway Labor Act as approved June 21,
1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute
involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing thereon.
Claimant, Richard Carrola, a Mechanical Department Electrician was
dismissed from service of the Carrier on August
23, 1977,
following investigation
held on August
16, 1977,
for alleged violation of portions of Rule 810 of the
General Rules and Regulations of the Carrier. Rule
810
reads as follows:
Form 1 Award No. 8206
Page 2 Docket No. 8023
2-spr-Ew-'79
Rule 810: "Employees must report for duty at the prescribed
time and place, they must not absent themselves from their
employment without proper authority.
Continued failure by employee to protect their employment
shall be sufficient cause for dismissal."
Claimant was adjudged guilty of failing to protect his employment through
continued absenteeism in the period between May 1, 1977 and July 15, 1977.
Claimant entered Carrier's service as a Laborer in 1966. In 1971, Claimant
transferred to the occupation of Electrician Regular apprentice.
Upon close scrutiny of the record, the Board determines Claimant received
a fair and impartial investigation. We find the evidence to be abundantly
clear and substantial with regard to Claimant's record of absenteeism and
tardiness for the period in question as summarized by the following statistics:
Absent 3 Days
Late to work or from lunch 11 Occurrences
Late to work and late from lunch 4 Occurrences
Left early 6 Occurrences
Late to work and left early 3 Occurrences
An analysis of the aforestated figures reveals that during the period under
consideration, Claimant worked only 8Wo of his scheduled work time.
It is the judgment of this Board that Claimant's pattern of absenteeism
and tardiness is a very large blemish on an otherwise acceptable work
record. Though the Board finds Claimant's behavior unsatisfactory, we
have concluded nevertheless that his may not be an altogether unsalvagable
situation. Thus, we are willing to accept the fact that the discipline before
us is the first formal discipline imposed upon the Claimant in his eleven (J.1)
years of employment with the Carrier and on that basis we shall view it as
excessive in the instant case.
Although we are willing to give the Claimant another but last and final
chance, this action by no means negates the Board's conclusion that Claimant's
record of absenteeism and tardiness is just simply unacceptable and in the
future shall not be tolerated beyond any reasonable length of time or beyond
any reasonable extent. The Board cautions the Claimant to protect his employment with the Carrier from this time forward.
Form 1 Award
sic. 8206
Page 3 Docket No. 8023
2-SPT-EW-`79
Claimant is to be reinstated to service without back pay, but with
seniority and all. other rights unimpaired, as the time off attributable heretofore to his dismissal shall serve as the penalty for having violated Rule
810. Claimant's continued employment shall be predicated upon maintaining an
acceptable work record especially with regard to absences and tardinesses.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUST BOARD
By Order of Second
Division
Attest: Executive Secretary
National Railroad
Adjustment Board
By
Av/~
-~s-. L,I
R semarie Brasch - Administrative Assistant
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 19th day of December
1979. i
i
I
t
I
i