Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD
ADJUST= BOARD Award No.
8240
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 8186
2-CR-BM-'80
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Herbert L. Marx, Jr. when award was rendered.
( System Federation ito. 1, Railway Employes'
( Department, A. F. of L. - C. I. 0.
_Paxties to Dispute: ( (Boilermakers)
(
( Consolidated
Rail
Corporation
Dispute: Claim of Employes:_
1. That Boilermaker W. Blanchard,, was improperly dismissed from service
following investigation held on July
5, 1978.
2. That accordingly the Carrier be ordered to reinstate the aforementioned
Boilermaker to service with all seniority rights unimpaired, all lost
wages, Health and Welfare,, Life Insurance, Vacation and Holiday pay now
in effect and any additional benefits that may be negotiated as a result
thereof until he is restored to service.
Findings:
The Second
Division of
the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all
the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute
are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act
as approved June 21,
1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute
involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing thereon.
Claimant was assigned as a Boilermaker and Welder, having been employed by
the Carrier since July 28,
1975.
An investigative hearing was held to determine the
causes of Claimant's unsatisfactory attendance record which the Carrier alleged. to
b e in violation of the 40-hour work week provision in Rule 1, Paragraph "B".
Notice of the hearing was mailed in the usual fashion to the Claimant, and the
receipt of same was acknowledged by someone with the same last name at the same
address. Claimant had been on the Carrier's property one week prior to the scheduled
day of the hearing but failed to appear at the hearing or to request a postponement
thereof.
At the hearing, there was no dispute to the information entered on the
record to the effect that the Claimant was absent on 30 days, late on six days, and
left early on one day during a
3~
month period.
Claimant's prior disciplinary record shows a 10-day record suspension and a
30-day actual suspension for poor attendance.
Form 1 - Award No.
8240
page 2 Docket No.
8186
2-CR-BM-' 80
Under the circumstances, the Board can see no reason to interfere with the
Carrier's determination to find the employe in violation of the duty of satisfactory
attendance, warranting his dismissal from service.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Second Division
Attest: Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board
semarie Brasch - Administrative Assistant
Dated ~t Chicago, Illinois, this 16th day of January
1980.