Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADiUSTVZ,i7 BOARD Award No.
v='43
SECOND DIVISIO1T Docket No. E C81-T
2-BTTI-FO-' 80
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Kay Mci:Parray when avrard was rendered.
( System Federation No. 7, Railway Employes
( Department, A. F. of L. - C. I. 0.
Parties to Disrnzte: (Firemen & Oilers)
Burlington Northern Inc.
Dispute: Claim of Fmnloyes:
1. That the Burlington Northern, Inc. violated the terms of the controlling
agreement, specifically Rule 27(a), when Shop Superintendent A. Jacobsen
did not make reply to General Chairman Burri11's claim, dated January 18,
1978,
until April 14,
1978,
which is
86
days after date said Claim was
filed.
2. That under the terms of the controlling Agreement, the Burlington Northern
Inc. denied Mr. Jerry C1aaM, laborer, Livingston, Nmntana, the contractual.
right to exercise seniority to position of P.:achinist Helper from m :Dece~ber
13, 1978,
which position z-ras bulletined and established ~rhile he eras on
a bonafide leave of absence.
3.
That, accordingly, the Burlington Northern, Inc. be ordered to compensate
Mr. Jerry Claar the difference in applicable helpers' rate of pay during
the aforementioned period, and also a sum of
$3.00
per working day,
account not transferred to aforesaid position within 10 days; from January
1, 1978
through September
73, 1978.
Findings:
The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all
the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute
are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor
Act as approved June 21,
1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute
involved herein.
Parties to said dispute taaived right of appearance at hearing thereon.
The Claimant, Mr. Claar, was employed as a laborer at the Carrier's Livingston,
Montana shop. From November 14, 1977 to
December
21, 197''(, he was on a medical
leave of absence. During that period of tire the Carrier advertised a vacancy i n
a Machinist Helper's position. In accordance with the contract, since theres:ere
no helpers available for immediate use, it wws assigned to the senior qualified
`-orer who bid the
job.
Upon his return to active service, Claimant requested that
be allowed to displace the party assigned the vacancy since he was senior to him.
Ir: so doing, he relied upon .pule i5 (e) of the agreement which reads in pertinent
part
Form I
4,
...
' 'nzi o-, e
a on leave or _.. sense a, s
.`n i,... . .r: ~'.n:-
1-o ..?'°':
_c· , ;~; ~_._.~.
'-7
s._~.~' -.U~»-,_.:'~
noS41..'r..`i.u ~i'r ..
Fven tua? denial ox" the cl
am
as outlined in the submission ; ave riv to 'the
problem--~: here under consideration.
The organization points out that the Carries violated Rule 27(a) of `she
agree-at vhich reads in
pertinent part:
~ ....Sho1LId an-7-7 such cl
o'4"
v-'rie"iance be diS::.11OZ·7ed, the Car-=_="
shaZI, 'svf.+trin si«ty tS(D) days from
-1he
date same is f"iIed,
nC`.__
;,
whoever
wil
ed the clal.,m or grievance
(the
em;,,lo-re or his re;;t'_~.~?iV~.ti~re)
in writing of the reasons for s,;ch disal-lowance.
ice:
rest so no-__ed,
tree claim o.' grievance shall be allo,.ved as presented."
'e foregoing 7an:g-aage is simple and e~·'D.i sit.
-t
.s not within t-^.
n
author,.ty
~n~ -y~
' ' L,
·d-i'%`·~ ~-~ y V nr_.
yl^ ..,.p r_.o t-
Iam'eraus
u'a.'?T.'.~G~.S
o'
.~ s'
w.r'd
of th
"` ~i~'C~'..:~...1. Lo _~._h~
~~ the
~G7riL.u o1 ~-_.~. .~.r_~, ~''v,~..1.11J·
f
V
have
'ut_rih~.~'d '-'i=`= V-'·y~.,~__..;T
of sues time
1_nits,
in
1:?_e
_ase unde'considc',
:._'C?i,
the
Carrier
cle~"..'....y n_x..~:.-~e.N...ed
tile
sL~'°dav ~y.'r
lin...7_·i
aid, ac~n..L~d.I._r'~°g
~-,.~5
.._.
:.~.1w.t
hold that the c~aL~ shaald
be a-! owed
1as
-)resented without any reference -~o the
merits...
ate Carrier violated Rule 27(a).
Maim sustained.
Attest: Executive Secretary
National
Iiai
lroad
Adj Las tnent Board
A W A R D
NAT
IMT1.V
RAILROAD A Dcl
ij>s
=it1 BO~;D
By order of Second Division
Dated at Chicago, y? ..2inois, this 6th day of 7,eb_r-:ary,
1;SJ.