Form 1 NATIOT~AZ RAILRO,I0 ADJUMTT·IKIT BOARD Award No, 8252
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 8158
2-UP-End-' 80
The Second Division consisted of the reg:iar members and
in addition Referee I.ay Iqc:surray when award 7rras rendered.
( System Federation 1,?o. 105, R ail,~ruy Enployes'
( Department, A. E. of L. - C. I. 0.
Parties to Dispute: ( (Electrical Workers)



Dis pute: C-1-aim of Employes:









Findin~s

The Second Di%'`i sicn of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and C.1?_ the evidence, finds tnat:


s~rit~ewp~.oyes involved in "his C1.SCL1i.o are respec'.,ive.:y carrier ?_, =d employe '~.e rr~eaning, of the Rai1T-ay Labor ?ct as approved June 21.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispate involved herein.



Tile clai'_'I-:x?nt, P. J. hotherh"m, 4 s employed as ail equi frentman at the Carrf.er t s Portland, Or eSon, C owmunica Lions Shop.

Ile ups notified by letjer dated January 17, 19 78, to appear on Jarxu= ry 31., for an investigation on the f o] lowing c:l~:,r;es














Form 1 Award No. 8262
Page 2 Docket No. 8158
2-UP-EW-'80
Rule 702 (b) reads
"Employees must comply zrith instructions from proper
authority."

The investigation was postponed due to the claiz:ant's medical leave of absence and eventually held on April 4, 1978.

Folloframg an appropriate hearing at which all ^wrties were freely allo:,:ed to present testi_z-aony, witnesses and cross examine the penalty herein complained of was assessed on LPril 7, 1978.

The gravamen of the Carrier's case is contained _n the Wire Chief's log for the day in question. That lob in pertinent part reads:



The cla:iznant a-gees that the log is essentially correct with the exception that he said he would cover but it would be at 7 A.i.'.

While the fore(-oing beh~.vior nay not illustrate a complete breach of'.r.le 702(b) it does constitute _p_erfor^,:ance belcvr that ~s~:_~i~ the carrier is entitled. to expect and some form of discipline was appropriate,


unsuitable. Tha CI- -4,-anU has suffered fin uncial and Enfltional loss s'?nce h45
dischar E;e and it- is ---pr ezim'_ed that- such an ex peri=Ce ,..Lll be ,i'E_:edi al in na tlue.
He is aLmonished that lie should be motivated :-:ore by his res_nonfibility a s an
employee than personal convenience.

Claimant w ill. be returned to service with the Carrier but without compensation for tine lost.


                            By Order of Second Division

Attest: Executive Secretary
National Railroad %djjustcent Board
By
r
      ,oseriarie Br asc'_i -- n.a:,ainis trative assn stunt


Dat1ed at Chicago, Illinois, this 5th day of ivarch, 1980.