Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 8315
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 8160
2-ICG-FO-'8o
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Rodney Eo Dennis when award was rendered.
( System Federation No. 99, Railway Employes'
( Department, A. F. of L. - C. I. 0.
Patties to Dispute- ( (Firemen & Oilers)



Dispute: Claim of Employes:





Findings:

The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and a1L the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 193+.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.



C. R. Ferguson, the claimant, a laborer at carrier's Johnston Roundhouse in Memphis, Tennessee, was discharged from service for possession of a controlled substance and for conPiction in criminal court on that charge. He was also charged with failing. to protect his assignment from January 14, 1978, to January 30, 1978, while he was in jail. The organization alleges that the ::artier made it impossible for the claimant to protect his assignment because it refused to cooperate in a work release program. that would have allowed him to be at work.

The record before this board clearly supports the position of the carrier. The claimant pleaded guilty to possession of a controlled substance. He was placed in the Shelby County Penal Farm and was unavailable for work. On numerous occasions, this hoard has stated that incarceration is not considered unavoidable absence from work for good cause. In these instances, carriers were upheld by this Board if discharge resulted from the inability of an employee to appear at work because he was in jail as a result of a crime he committed..

The organization's argument that carrier caused the claimant to remain in, jail by not participating in a work release program cannot prevail. Carrier's officials are responsible for the decision to participate in such programs. Carrier is under no contractual or legal obligation, or bound by the directions of this Board to participate in these programs.
Form 1 Award No. 8315
Page 2 Docket No, 8160
2-IC G-FO-' 80

The claimant in this case, by his own fault, caused himself to be absent from work without authority. This Board has no recourse but to uphold the carrier's position, despite its refusal to participate in a work release program.






                            By Order of Second Division


Attest: Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board

By ./
R semarie Brasch - Administrative Assistant

Dated t Chicago, Illinois, this 16th day of April, 1980,