Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 8327
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 8201
2-CR-MA.-' 80
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Rodney E. Dennis when award was rendered,






Dispute: Claim of Employes:_





Findings:

The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 193.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.



This case involves a dispute over whether carrier violated the contractual agreement, specifically Rule 2 A-1 (E), when it denied Machinist R. J. McMulle:n three hours of penalty pay on seven occasions while assigning him to dismantle; and assemble E-44 equipment blowers. Claimant was assigned a regular bulletined position on the first shift at carrier's ~Tuniata Machine Shop facilities. The bulletined position specifies the duties as follows: "Do all layout work and miscellaneous bench work required. Read blueprints and use micrometers."

The record established that while claimant did not receive penalty pay on the seven occasions in question, he did receive three hours of penalty pay thx·ee other times when he was assigned work on E-4+ blowers. Carrier argues that this payment was in error and should not be continued. The carrier also contends work on blowers is not part of a bulletined position. It is miscellaneous
Form 1 Award No. 8327
Page 2 Docket No, 8201
2-CR-MA-'80

bench work and should be done by machinists. The organization opposes this characterization of the work and insists that claimant was assigned work that was not in any way part of his bulletined assignment.

After a review of the record, this Board finds that the carrier has violated Article 2-A-1 (E) of the controlling agreement. Article 2-A-1 (E) clear7.y states that three hours°.pat at straight time will be paid to an employee who is, by direction of management, assigned to work in another position. From the record before it, this Board cannot construe the work on E-4+ blowers, as described here to be part of claimant's bulletined assignment or miscellaneous work. Carrier assigned claimant to a location in the shop away from his regular work area and directed him to dismantle, repair, and reassemble E-44 equipment blowers. Such work is not included in claimant's bulletined assignment.

Carrier's argument that claimant was assigned this work because of lack of work on his regular assignment cannot prevail. Theca is no evidence in the record to support such an assertion. In addition, this argument was not presented and discussed on the property, It cannot, therefore, be advanced at the Board level of this dispute. This Board has consistently held that arguments not advanced on the property will not be considered by it.






                            By Order of Second Division


Attest: Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board

                              l


By _
      osemarie Brasch - Administrative Assistant


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 16th day of April, 1980.