Form 1 NATIQNU RAILROAD ADJUST= BOARD Award No. 8348
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 8304
2-D&M-MA-'80
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Higdon C. Roberts,, Jr. when award was rendered.



Parties to Dispute:



Dispute: Claim of Lm playes:





Findings:

The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that

The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway habor Act as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.



It is not the sole responsibility of the accused (claimant) to notify his union representative of impending investigation. The carrier has the responsibility as implied by the contract language, and common and past practice on this carrier and in the industry. The accused may not wish to be represented, but the organization has the right, and in fact, duty, to protect the agreement as it applies to all employees, not just the accused.

In many cases, where the accused does not request representation, it is based on inadequate knowledge of hearing-investigations, the assumption of innocence and/or lack of understanding of consequences of the hearing findings. There can be other reasons. None relieve the carrier of the notification responsibility. This is a violation of Rule 32.
Form l Award No. 83+8
Page 2 Docket No. 830+
2-D&M-MA-'80



Claim sustained. Claimant reinstated to service with seniority rights, and all other regular job rights and benefits, and to be compensated for full wage loss sustained while out of service.


                            By Order of Second Division


Attest: Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board

By

~o emarie Brasch - Administrative Assistant

Dated t Chicago, Illinois, this 21st day of May, 1980,