Form 1
Parties to Dispute:
Dispute: Claim of
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No.
8416
SECOND DIVISION Docket No.
8313
2-WT-CM-'80
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Higdon C. Rob erts,
Jr.
when award was rendered.
System Federation No. 106, Railway Employest
Department, A. F. cf L. - C. I. 0.
(Carmen)
Washington Terminal Company
1. That under the current agreement Car Cleaner E. B. Ferguson was unjustly
dealt with when he was taken out of service June
28, 1978,
and as a
result of an investigation was given a suspension of forty five calendar
days which was unjust, unfair, and capricious and in violation of
rule
29
of the controlling agreement.
That the Washington Terminal Company b e ordered to reimburse Mx.
Ferguson for his net wage loss, and his record be cleared, due to this
unjust treatment by Carrier.
The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all
the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute
are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act
as approved June
21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute
involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing thereon.
Here the record show that the claimant (Mr. Ferguson) was standing talking
to two other employees in a car other than the one he was assigned to clean.
When told by his supervisor (Ms. Wi7liams) to return to his assigned duty station,
he did not move. When Ms. Williams and Assistant Foreman Best returned to the
car some 10 minutes later, the claimant had still not left, and did not do so
even when told by Mr. Best. Mr. Ferguson was guilty of both loitering and
insubordination (Rule N). He was not, however, nasty, or in any strong, overt
manner, insubordinate.
The manner of the insubordination, and the fairly brief loitering time,
combined with the rather casual way that Ms. Williams had originally ordered
him to his car, deserve consideration. The penalty is excessive, and we order
suspension reduced to
35
days.
Form l Award No. 841.6
Page 2 Docket No. 8313
2-WT-CM-180
A WA R D
Claim sustained to the extent indicated in the Findings.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADa1STMENT BOARD
By Order of Second Division
Attest: Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board
By
os rie Brasch - Administrative Assistant
Dated a Chicago, Illinois, this 23rd day of
July, 1980.