Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 8491
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 8236
2-A&S-MA-'80
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee David H. Brown when award was rendered.
( International Association of Machinists and
( Aerospace Workers
Parties to Dispute:
(
( Alton and Southern Railway Company
Dispute: Claim of Employes:
1. That under the terms of the Agreement, Machinist, Gary M. Stephens
was unjustly suspended from the service of The Alton and Southern
Railway Company for a period of thirty
(30)
days beginning on the
date of November 9, 1977, and ending on the date of December
8,
1977.
2. That accordingly The Alton and Southern Railway Company be ordered to
compensate Machinist, Gary M. Stephens in the amount of eight
(8)
hours at the pro rata rate for each day of his work week assignment
beginning on the date of November
9,
1977, through the date of December
8,
1977.
3.
And, further, The Alton and Southern Railway Company remove all
written records to this investigation and suspension from Machinist,
Gary M. Stephen's service record.
Findings:
The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and a17.
the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute
are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act:
as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute
involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing thereon.
At all pertinent times Gary M. Stephens was regularly employed as a
machinist at Carrier's locomotive shop in East St. Louis, Illinois, with regularly
assigned work week Monday through Friday 11:00 P.M. to 7:00 A.M., third shift,
rest days Saturday and Sunday.
At about 10:30 P.M. on October 27, 1977, Claimant telephoned Combination
Foreman Dennis gorando and advised him that he would be about an hour late,
requesting Korando to see if he could get the machinist on duty to cover for him.
Korando "told him that there would be no problem, it would be okay". Claimant
requested the delay in reporting because his mother had started to have chest
pains. Claimant was the only one living with his mother and was concerned
Form l Award No.
8491
Page 2 Docket No.
8236
2-MP-MA-'80
about leaving her until other arrangements could be made or her condition
stabilized. Instead, her condition worsened until it was decided she should be
hospitalized. This decision was made between 11:00 and 11:15 P.M., and Claimant
then had his mother admitted to the hospital. At 12:20 A.M. Claimant made the
first of four telephone calls to notify Car Foreman Jack Nooney that he would
be unable to protect his assignment. The telephone at the shop was not answered
until
6:30
A.M., at which time he advised Mr. Nooney of the reason for his absence.
Claimant had remained at the hospital with his mother, feeling that her condition
demanded his presence.
Formal investigation was held on November
4, 1977,
"to develop the facts
and place (Claimant's) responsibility, if any, in connection with ... failure to
protect your assignment at 11:00 P.M., October 27,
1977."
As a result of such
investigation Claimant received
30
days actual suspension for failure to protect
his assignment as charged.
We have carefully reviewed the transcript of such investigation and the
entire record and must conclude that while Claimant did fail to protect his
assignment, the circumstances were totally exonerative. His absence from work
was justified; his efforts to contact Carrier, under the circumstances, were
sufficient.
A W A R D
Claim sustained.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Second Division
Attest: Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board
By
v
semarie Brasch - Administrative Assistant
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 5th day of November,
1980.