Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No.
8606
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 8467
2-SLSF-CM-'81
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Herbert L. Marx, Jr. when award was rendered.
( Brotherhood Railway Carmen of the United States
Parties to Dispute: ( and Canada
(
( St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company
Dispute: Claim of Employes:
1. That the St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company violated the controlling
Agreement and Memorandum of Agreement between St. Louis-San Francisco
Railway Company and Brotherhood Railway Carmen of the United States and
Canada, signed at Springfield, Missouri, the 8th day of July, 1977,
effective July 1,
1977.
2. That accordingly the St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company be ordered
to compensate Carman Apprentices R. L. Hinkle, G. P. Donnell, R. D.
Harlen, S. L. Jones, J. B. Dahlman, D. W. Anderson, R. C. Workman, J.. E.
Elbert, D. B. Taylor, D. L. Mettlack, 0. D4 Whitehead, J. B. Johnson_ F. M.
Donnell and D. L. Dieus for January
3,
197$, the difference in pay between
Apprentice rate of pay and the Carman Journeyman-Welders rate of pay and
for each hour thereafter.
3. That the aforementioned Apprentices be promoted.
That this claim is continuous until satisfactorily settled.
Findings
The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all
the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute
are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act
as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute
involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing thereon.
This claim concerns interpretation of the Memorandum of Agreement dated
July 1, 1977 concerning apprentices, as mutually agreed between the Carrier and the
Organization.
For reasons which need not be detailed here, the memorandum of Agreement
established a list of "temporary carmen" consisting of apprentices and helpers
who were serving in temporary upgraded journeyman positions at the effective date
of the Memorandum of Agreement. The employes on this list were placed in order of
length of service as temporary carmen, rather than in order of their seniority as
apprentices or helpers.
Form 1 Award No.
8606
Page
2
Docket No.
8467
2-SLSF-CM-181
All temporary carmen (that is, temporarily upgraded apprentices and temporarily
upgraded helpers were subject to a reduction of force at the Springfield Shops on
or about December
23, 1977
and were set back to apprentice status. In this claim,
there is no dispute as to the propriety of this action.
On or about December 30,
1977
and January
3, 1078,
the Carrier set about
restoring the forces and gave temporary upgraded status to apprentices in the order
of their listing on the previously established roster of temporary carmen. In
other words, the Carrier simply returned to the status prior to the December
23,
1977
furlough.
The organization contends that this was in error, contrary to the general
agreement between the parties, as well as the July i,
1977
Memorandum of Agreement.
According to the claim, upgraded to temporary carmen status should have been by
seniority order as apprentice.
It is solely this difference which the Board is asked to resolve. Pertinent
portions of the July 1,
1977
Memorandum of Agreement ate as follows:
"6.
(a) The practice of upgrading carman helpers is
discontinued. In the event of not being able to employ
journeyman mechanics
of
the Carmen's Craft
or
carmen with
three years' experience, the force may be increased by
promoting the senior qualified apprentices.,
e..
(e) A list of temporary carmen shall be prepared and
maintained at each seniority point of those apprentices
promoted to mechanics as set forth in paragraph (a)
hereof. Such list of temporary carmen shall show the
name of apprentices promoted in date order and the date
promoted. In the event of more than one employe being
promoted on the same date, they will rank according to
the number of hours credited at that time towards
completion of the training. When force is reduced, the
junior temporary carmen will be set back first."
The Memorandum of Agreement is clear, in section
6
(e), as to the order of
reducing temporary carmen; i.e., "the junior temporary carmen will be set back
first. Coming as part of a paragraph dealing with the order of listing of
temporary carmen, this clearly refers to service in this capacity and not as
apprentices.
Paragraph
6
(e) is silent, however, as to restoring the positions of temporary
carmen. As the Organization points out, this is covered in Paragraph
6
(a) which states
that, when needed, "the force may be increased by promoting the senior qualified
apprentices". (Emphasis added.
However well intended the Carrier's action in giving preference to those
employes who were on the temporary carmen list prior
to
the December
23, 1977
furlough, the Board cannot find support for this In the specific words of the
Memorandum of Agreement. Paragraph
6
(a) is concerned with upgrading and
speaks of priority for "senior qualified apprentices". (Emphasis added.
Form I Award No. 8606
Page
3
Docket No. 81+6'7
2-SLSF-CM-181
The Carrier may argue that "qualified" refers to service on the temporary
carmen list. Whatever other meaning "qualified" has, the Memorandum of Agreement
does not specify such interpretation.
The Carrier also argues that Paragraph 6 (e) speaks of a temporary carmen
list to be prepared and "maintained". Obviously, it was maintained after it was
created, else it would be of no purpose. The Board cannot read this to mean,
however, that after employes are set back they are given rights to be restored
to such list, in the face of the requirements of Paragraph
6
(a) which deals
specifically with upgrading.
A W A R D
Claim sustained.
NATIONAL RAIIROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Second Division
Attest: Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board
By
~1>.f,-L-c_-1.~_.r -
R
/7~;
er
semarie Brasch - Administrative Assistant
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 21st day of January,
1981.