Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 8652
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 8488
2-L&N-CM-'81
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Paul C. Carter when award was rendered.
( Brotherhood Railway Carmen of the United States
Parties to Dispute: ( and Canada




Dispute: Claim of Employes:













Findings:

The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act: as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.



On the date of the occurrence out of which the claim herein arose, claimant: was working as a carman, having entered Carrier's service as an apprentice on June 6, 1967, and with seniority as a carman from May 5, 1971.

On the night of January 14, 1978, the Carrier's Radnor, Tennessee, wrecker was called for 9:x+5 P.M. The Foreman-Car Shop arrived at the wrecker track about 9:30 P.M. Upon his arrival at the wrecker, the Foreman was asked by the claimant if he could receive a radio so that he could pick up his girl friend at the air port and meet the wrecker later at Bruceton, Tennessee, where the wrecker was to be sent. The Claimant's request was denied by the Foreman. The record shows that there was some further discussion, with the Claimant stating at one time "Well, I just won't go", (with the wrecker). Later the Claimant told the Foreman that if the Foreman did not go along with his earlier xeqrseot thot he (the
Form 1 Award No. 8652
Page 2 Docket No. 81188
2-L&N-CM-'81

claimant would have to hit him (the Foreman. The Foreman again denied the request, at which time the claimant struck the Foreman.









The investigation was conducted by Carrier's Superintendent-Terminal on January 26, 1978. The claimant was present throughout the investigation and was represented by his Local Chairman. A copy of the transcript of the investjLgation has been made a part of the record. A review of the transcript shows that: the hearing was conducted in, a fair and impartial manner, and that none of claimant's substantive procedural rights was violated. There was substantial evidence adduced at the investigation, including claimant's statement, of the charge of "assaulting an official, Mr. R. R. Haley, and threatening Master Mechanic T. M. Harris and General Car Foreman D. J. Lilly". There was also evidence by a Special Agent that the odor of alcohol was detected on claimant. Claimant stated that the last drink that he had was about three hours prior to coming on duty.

Following the investigation, Claimant was dismissed from service on February 15, 1978.

Upon review of the entire record, the Board finds that Carrier's action in dismissing claimant from the service was not arbitrary, capricious or in bad faith. There is no proper basis for the Board to interfere with the discipline imposed.




Form 1 Award No. 8652
Page 3 Docket No. 8h88
2-i,&N-CM-'81
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Second Division
Attest: Executive Secretary


By


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 4th day of March, 1981.