Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Avard No. 87113
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 7929
2-D&RGW-CM-'81
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Robert A. Franden when award was rendered.
( Brotherhood Railway Carmen of the United States
Parties to Dispute: ( and Canada




Dispute: Claim of Employes:





Findings

The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.



This claim is based on an alleged violation of Rule 8(b) which claim resulted when on July 26, 1976, the carrier called one other than the claimant to perform overtime work.

The claimant has takenfhe position that the carrier must follow the order of the overtime list when assigning overtime. We do nct agree. A violation of Rule 8(b) can be made out only by a showing that overtime was not assigned "with the purpose in view of distributing the overtime equally". This requires more than was shown in this case.






By c.,. r',
Rdsemarie Brasch - Administrative Assistant

Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 26th day of August, 1981.