Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 8763
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 8255
2-NRPC-EW-181
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee George E. Larney when award was rendered.
( International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
Parties to Dispute:
~ National Railroad Passenger Corporation

Dispute: Claim of Employes:













Findings:

The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act: as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.


F orm 1 Page 2

Award No. 8763
Docket No. 8255
2 -NR PC -EW-' 81 ·.r''

The several claims herein were initiated and advanced by the Organization under the contention Carrier violated the Memorandum of Understanding with regard to the application of the last paragraph of Rule 2-A-1(e) contained in the System Federation No. 152 and Penn Central Railroad Agreement of April 1, 1952 with amendments of 1961, 1974, and 1976, which the Organization alleges is the controlling agreement.

On the other hand, the Carrier at all times material to the handling of these claims has denied them on the basis that the controlling agreement in effect is the one between it and the Organization dated September 1, 1975.

The Board views this controversy between the parties regarding which agreement is controlling as posing a threshold question which must first be resolved before moving to consideration of the merits of the instant claims. It is the Board's judgment that resolution of this threshold question can be resolved only by rendering an interpretation as to the meaning and applicability of Section 504(f)(2) of Title V of the Regional Rail Reorganization Act of 1973, as amended. Such an interpretation however, the Board notes, causes a jurisdictional question to arise as to whether our Board or Special Board of Adjustment 880 has the authority to construe the subject Section. Based on a full review of the evidence of record before us, we are of the opinion that Special Board of Adjustment 880 has the authority to render such an interpretation and that our Board does not. We therefore at this time defer consideration of the merits of the instant claims and direct the threshold question be remanded to Special Board of Adjustment 880.

A W A R D

The Board directs the threshold question as to which Agreement is controlling be remanded to the Special Board of Adjustment 880.



NATIONAL RAIIROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD

By Order of Second Division


Attest: Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board

By _ .---s.~-a.
,i .osemerie Brasch - Administrative Assistant

Date at Chicago, Illinois, this 16th day of September, 1981.