Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 8771
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 8657
2-BN-CM-181
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Rodney E. Dennis when award was rendered.
( Brotherhood Railway Carmen of the United States
Parties to Dispute: ( and Canada




Dispute: Claim of Employes:





Findings:

The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that

The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.



Claimant T. L. Brunell is a car person in carrier's Havelock Shop in Lincoln, Nebraska. She was disqualified from part of her duties as a painter, that of painting the interior of air slide cars. The organization alleges that this disqualification was improper and that carrier never gave claimant any help to qualify her to paint these cars. Rule 13(g) requires that carrier give aid to qualify employes. Carrier takes the position that it allowed claimant more than the required limit of 30 days to qualify. She could not qualify and thus was taken off the job.






Form 1 Award No. 8771
Page 2 Docket No. 8657
2-BN-CM-181
"vacancies. In the event such employe is not disqualified within
thirty (30) days because of incompetency, he shall be considered
qualified for such position."

The record of this case reveals that claimant properly bid and was awarded the job of painting the interiors of air slide cars on the 4 to 12 shift. It also reveals that the task of properly painting these cars under artificial light as is required on the 4 to 12 shift is very difficult. The record states that only two of about 18 painters at the Havelock Shop could properly paint the interior of an air slide car. It also reveals that carrier did not give claimant any training or instruction o- how to perform properly the very difficult task of painting the interior of these special cars.

Rule 13(g) clearly implies that carrier will work with an employe in order to help him or her qualify for a bid job that has been awarded. In the instant case, the record is barren of any probative evidence to indicate that carrier supervisory personnel instrucced claimant in the proper methods to be used in painting the inside of these cars.

It is the opinion of this Board that carrier did not do all it could to help claimant qualify for the job in question. It is also the opinion of this Board that claimant should receive another chance, if she chooses to accept it, to qualify as a painter of the interiors of air slide cars. Carrier is therefore directed to give claimant another chance to obtain the job if it again comes up for bid and to give her 30 days to qualify, with the understanding that carrier gives claimant the proper instruction in how to achieve the standards of painting required by carrier and the government.



    The claim is sustained per findings of the Board.


                            NATIONAL, RAILROAD ADJUSTI`ENT BOARD

                            By Order of Second Division


Attest: Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board

By _
osemarie Brasch - Administrative Assistant

      Dat d at Chicago, Illinois, this 30th day of September, 1981.