Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 8820
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 8701·-T
2 AT8o3F-BM-' 81
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Joseph A. Sickles when award was rendered.
( International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, Iron Ship
Parties to Dispute: ( Builders, Blacksmiths, Forgers & Helpers



Dispute: Claim of Employes:












Findings:

The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employs or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employs within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.



The Employes make claim on behalf of certain Boilermakers because the Carrier had work performed by the Machinist's classification; which work dealt with track construction. The Employes insist that the work was properly assigned to them under the controlling agreement.

The Organization has raised an asserted procedural defect; questioning the timeliness of a Carrier reply. However, as we view the record, we are unable to agree that the Carrier failed to abide by the controlling rules.

Concerning the merits of the dispute, we note that the Carrier raised, on the property, the assertion that any dispute such as the one under consideration. should be hatndled under the provisions of Rule 114 of the agreement. It further
Form 1 Award No. 8820
Page 2 Docket No. 8701-T


cx0tended that the "existing practice" of Machinists performing the work in dispute should be continued - without penalty - until such time as the matter is resolved under Rule 114.

We have noted the Organization's resistance to Rule 114, as expressed while the matter was under review on the property. Fiomver, in our view, Rule 114 is rather clear, and specifies a procedure to be followed when this type of a dispute arises. The failure to comply with Rule 114 operates to divest us of the authority to consider the case and issue a ruling on the merits, due to the failure to exhaust the contractually provided remedy:





Accordingly, we are compelled to dismiss the claim.



    Claim dismissed.


                            NATIONAL RAIIROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD

                            By Order of Second Division


Attest: Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board

                ~-,_.___


By -~'
semarie Brasch - Administrative Assistant

Date at Chicago, Illinois, this 10th day of November, 1981.