Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 8832
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 8598
2
-c&o
-cM-' 81
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee David P. Twomey when award was rendered,
( Brotherhood Railway Carmen of the United States
Parties to Dispute:
( and Canada
(
( Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company
Dispute: Claim of Employes:
1. That the service rights of regular assigned wreck crew members at
Stevens, Kentucky, Frank Braun, James Fryman, L. C. Heiert, E. Rachford,
B. Ellison and E. Lipton and Article VII - Wrecking Service of the
December 4, 1975 National Agreement and letter of (interim) understanding,
dated May 17, 1976, Files: X79 and x+50-R (7-1-74) were violated on
January 27, and 28, 1977.
2. Accordingly, the following listed carmen are each entitled to be
additionally compensated as follows:
Frank Braun, 1 and 3/4 hours at time and one-half for the period 9:15 p.m.,
1-27-77 to 11:00 P.m., 1-27-77 and 7 hours double time for the period
11:00 p.m., 1-27-77 to 6:00 a.m., 1-28-77. James Fryman, 8 and 3/4
hours at time and one-half for the period 9:15 P.m., 1-27-77 to 6:00 a.m.
1-28-77, L. C. Heiert, one and
3/4
hours at time and one-half for the
period 9:15 p.m., 1-27-77 to 11:00 P.m., 1-27-77, 7 hours double time
11:00 p.m., 1-27-77 to 6:00 a.m., 1-28-77. E. Rachford, 8 and 3/4
hours double time from 9:15 P.m., 1-27-77 to 6:00 a.m., 1-28-77. B.
Ellison, 2 and 1/2 hours at time and one-half for the period 9:15 P.m.,
1-27-77 to 11:20 p.m., 1-27-77,
6
and 2/3 hours at double time for
period 11:20 p.m., 1-27-77 to 6:00 a.m., 1-28-77. E. Lipton 2 and 1/2
imur5 at time and one-half for the period 9:15 p.m., 1-27-77 to 11:20
p.m., 1-27-77, 6 and 2/3 hours at double time for period 11:20 p.m.,
1-27-77 to 6:00 a.m., 1-28-77.
Findings:
The Second Division of the Adjustment Board., upon the whole record and all
the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute
are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act
as approved June 21, 193+.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute
involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing thereon.
The organization set forth the facts of the instant dispute in its Submission
as follows:
Form 1 Award No.
8832
Page
2
Docket No.
8598
2-C&O-CM-'81
"On January
27, 1977,
Train
X92,
engine
#3'722,
eastbound out
of Stevens, Kentucky derailed a portion of its train about
40
miles east of Stevens, Kentucky at approximately 1:00 p.m.,
1-27-77
six of the regular assigned men from the Stevens tool
car crew were dispatched to the scene of the derailment and
remained on duty until relieved at
9:15
p.m.,
1-27-77.
After the Stevens crew was relieved the Russell, Kentucky
tool cars and an outside contractor remained on duty until
approximately
5:00
a.m.,
1-28-77.
Had the Stevens wreck crew
remained on duty the earliest possible time that they could have
been relieved would have been
6:00
a.m. on
1-28-77."
The Organization contends that the Carrier violated Article VII-Wrecking
Service of the December
4, 1975
Agreement because an outside contractor, the
Hulcher Company, and the Russell Kentucky wrecking crew remained in wrecking
service after the Stevens, Kentucky regular assigned wrecking crew was relieved
from service.
Article VII states as follows:
"Article VII - Wrecking Service of the December
4, 1975
National
Agreement.
1. When pursuant to rules or practices, a Carrier utilizes the
equipment of a contractor (with or without forces) for the
performance of wrecking service, a sufficient number of the
carrier's assigned wrecking crew, if reasonably accessible to the
wreck, will be called (with or without the carrier's wrecking
equipment and its operators) to work with the contractor. The
contractor's ground forces will not be used, however, unless all
available and reasonably accessible members of the assigned
wrecking crew are called. The number of employes assigned to the
carrier's wrecking crew for purposes of this rule will be the
number assigned as of the date of this agreement. Note: In
determining whether the carrier's assigned wrecking crew is
reasonably accessible to the wreck, it will be assumed that
the groundmen of the wrecking crew are called at approximately
the same time as the contractor is instructed to proceed to
the work."
We find that the Carrier met its obligations under Article VII of the
December
4, 1975
when it called and used its Russell, Kentucky Wrecking Crew to
work with the outside contractor. There is no requirement in Article VII that
the Carrier use more than one wrecking crew to work along with the contractor's
forces at a derailment site. Please see Second Division Award No.
8106
and
Second Division Award No.
8725.
We therefore must deny this claim.
Resolution of the Carrier's arguments on whether there is a wrecking crew
at Russell, Kentucky and the Organization's counter position based on Second
Division Awards
7926
and
8766
is not essential to the disposition of this dispute
since the Carrier was in compliance with Article VII by calling and using the
Russell, Kentucky Wrecking Crew to work with the outside farces.
Form 1 Award No.
8832
Page
3
Docket'No.
8598
2-c&o-cm-' 81
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Second Division
Attest: Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board
By
sIlmarie Brasch - Administrative Assistant
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 9th day of December,
1981.