Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 8837
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 8761
2-BN-FO-181
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Paul C. Carter when award was rendered.
( International Brotherhood of Firemen & Oilers
Parties to Dispute:
( Burlington Northern Railroad Company

Dispute: Claim of Employes:





Findings:

The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 193+.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction aver the dispute involved herein.



Claimant was working as hostler helper with hostler W. L. McLain. Following an investigation held on Maroh 12,. 197, to determine "responsibility in connection with sideswipe damage to Unit BN 6+33 on wash rack track and BN 61+3+ on No. 1 track east of Diesel Shop about 9:50 P.M-, March 4, 1979 at the Havre Diesel Shop, Havre, Montana", claimant was suspended from the service for ten days from March 30, 1979, through April 12, 1979 and entry of censure placed upon his personal record.

A copy of the transcript of the investigation conducted on March 12, 1979 has been made a part of the record. We have reviewed the transcript and find no support for the allegation of impropriety by the conducting officer. While an allegation of impropriety was made by the Local Chairman of the UTU at the beginning of the investigation, no evidence was introduced to support such allegation.

The rather extensive record indicates that on the date involved, the claimant was directing the coupling of unit BN 6+33 to BN 1531, located on the wash rack track east of the Diesel Shop at Havre, Montana. At approximately 9:50 P.M., after the coupling was made, with the claimant standing in the area between
Form 1 Award No. 8837
page 2 Docket No. 8761
2-BN-FO-181

Units 6433 and 1531 to observe whether a proper joint had been made, BN 6433 teed westward to stretch the joint. In doing so, Unit 6433 sideswiped the west unit, BN 6434, of a three unit consist, which had just come out of the Diesel Shop and was proceeding eastward onto the running lead track. Both units were substantially damaged. The claimant and hostler W. L. McLain, who was operating Unit BN 633 were held responsible for the sideswipe. As we understand claimant was disciplined on the ground that he was not in the proper place, on the point, when the movement of Unit 6433 was made.

In the investigation, the General Foreman Locomotives, on questioning by the claimant stated:









As the hostler helper was in the proper location to observe the stretching of the joint, and the movement in stretching the joint was the cause of the sideswipe, we do not consider it proper for claimant to have been disciplined for not being on the point when the movement of Unit BN 6433 was made.






                            By Order of Second Division


Attest: Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board

By ~~(/
      osemarie Brasch - Administrative Assistant


Date at Chicago, Illinois, this 9th day of December, 1981.