Form 1 NATIONAL RATIROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 8959
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 911+8
2-C&NW-CM-'B2
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Edward L. Suntrup when award was rendered.
( Brotherhood Railway Carmen of the United States
Parties to Dispute: ( and Canada




Dispute: Claim of Employes:







Findings:

The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.



Claimant, Mr. T. E. Kromolicki, is an employee of the Chicago and North Western Transportation Company. At the time of the incident under consideration Claimant was a Passenger Truck Repairman working the third shift. On July 7, 1979 at approximately 4:45 A.M., Claimant was observed to be purportedly sleeping by Mr. R. M. Rambhajan, Carrier Shop Superintendent of M19-A Diesel Shop, and by Mr. F. Haas, General Foreman. According to the official transcript, upon request by Mr. Rambhajan, Mr. Haas woke Claimant by calling his name and shaking his arm. When Claimant was asked if he was okay, he responded in the affirmative. Late that same day, at approximately 6:x+5 A.M. Claimant told Shop Superintendent Ramghajan that he had been working double shifts and that he was tired. It was also at this time that Claimant was informed that he was being written up for sleeping and that he should contact his Local Chairman.
~~'c.) ran I Award No. 8959
Docket No. 9148
2-C&NW-CM-'82

On. July g, 1979 Claimant was notified by Mr. W. H. Wonnell, Manager of Suburban Operations-Mechanical, to appear for formal investigation on July 12, 1979. The charge was that he had been in violation of Rule 23 of the General Regulations and Safety Rules. On July 3, 1979 Claimant was notified, again by Mr. Wonnell, that the investigation was postponed until August 13, 1979. Receipt of this notice was signed by Mr. H. Marta, who represented Claimant during the hearing on August 13, 1979.





As a consequence of the hearing held on August 13, 1979 Claimant was given an actual suspension of thirty (30) days by Carrier.

It is the position of the Board that, contrary to the contention of Lhe Organization, Carrier did prove the charge against the Claimant and Carrier established Claimant's responsibility for sleeping while on duty. Claimant did not deny that he was sleeping to the Shop Supewintendent, nor to Hearing Officer J. F. Bowen during the subsequent August 13, 1979 hearing. Nor was it ever clearly established that it was a lunch break, which purportedly had not been taken at an earlier hour, when Claimant was, in fact, asleep --- aside the additional issue which a fortiori does not have to be resolved here of whether lunch break is "duty" time or not since it is a paid break.






                            By Order of Second Division


Attest: Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board

By __,J - . ~~ `~ ~- ,-~'' __

    Rosemarie Brasch - Administrative Assistant


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 3rd day of March,, 1982.