Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 8981
SECOND DIVISION Docket NO. 8997
2-SCL-CM-182




Parties to Dispute: ( and Canada
(


Dispute: Claim of Employes:






























Findings:

The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.


'nt Y Award No.8981
;.age ~: Docket No. 8997
2-SCL-CM-182


March 28, 1.968 Memorandum of Agreement. The central issues and arguments
involving the Memorandum have been recently considered by the Board in Second
Division Award 7412 and Aaaxd 8980. The Board in 7412 stated that the
meruorandum was clear and unambiguous in that the Carrier could not transfer
employes between shops for the purpose of filling "day to day vacancies". In
Award 8980 we added that day to day vacancies were those known to exist only on
a day to day basis. For example, vacation vacancies and extended illness known
to exist for more than one day's duration are not "day to day vacancies". We
taeld it was a violation of the agreement to fill day to day vacancies by
transferring employees but that it was not a violation of the agreement for
the Carrier to fill other than day to day vacancies (i.e. vacations and
extended illnesses) on a day to day basis. We also held that in order to sustain
their burden of proof, the employees must show that the vacancies, fillet by Lhe
Carrier with transferred employees, are "day to day vacancies".

In the instant case, the Carrier has established that the vacancies of Mr. L. R. Long, Mr. D. A. Gartenbush and Mr. R. Collins were not "day to day vacancies". In this regard we observe the following statement made by the Master Mechanic in the handling of the grievance:








In regard to the remainder of the vacancies, we find no denial or refutation by the Carrier of the Organization's contention that they were day to day vacancies. The filling of the remaining vacancies by transferring employees from West Jacksonville was a violation of the Agreement. In view thereof, the follc%ring Claimants' are entitled to the following pay for the following dates but only at the straight time rate of pay.













Form 1 Award No. 8981
Page 3 Docket No. 8997
2-SCL-CM-'82
NATIONAL RAIIROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Second Division
Attest: Executive Secretary


By h


Dated//at Chicago, Illinois, this 10th day of March, 1982.