Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 9034
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 9006
2-CR-FO-182
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Robert W. McAllister when award was rendered.
( International Brotherhood of Firemen and Oilers
-Parties to Dispute:
( Consolidated Rail Corporation
Dispute: Claim of Employes:
1. That, in violation of the current agreement, Laborer W. P. Alcendor
was unjustly dismissed from service of the carrier following trial held
on September 26, 1979.
2. That, accordingly, the Carrier be ordered to make the aforementioned
W. P. Alcendor whole by restoring him to Carrier's service, with seniority
rights unimpaired, made whole for all vacation rights, holidays, sick.
leave benefits, and all other benefits that are a condition of employment
unimpaired, and compensated for all lost time plus ten (10°%) percent
interest annually on all lost wages, also reimbursement for all
losses sustained account of coverage under health and welfare and life
insurance agreements during the time he has been held out of service.
Findings:
The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all,
the evidence, finds that
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute
are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act
as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute
involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing thereon.
The Claimant, a laborer, with twenty-two months of service was dismissed in all
capacities by letter of October 16, 1979, wherein the offenses outlined were:
"1.Out of assigned area
1:50
A.M. to
1:55
A.M. August
30,
1979, at Harrisburg Locomotive Terminal.
2. Loitering in a cab of Conrail locomotive
1:50
A.M. to
1:55
A.M. August
30,
1979, at Harrisburg Locomotive
Terminal.
3.
Sleeping while on duty 1:50 A.M. to
1:55
A.M. August
30,
1979, at Harrisburg Locomotive Terminal."
The investigation was held as scheduled on October 16, 1979. The Organization
protests the dismissal as arbitrary, capricious,
unjust,
and an abuse of managerial
Form 1 Award No. 9034
'?age 2 Docket No. 9006
2-CR-FO-182
discretion. The record shows that Shop Superintendent Stayer instructed Foreman
Guyer he wanted the roof washed on #6248. Foreman Guyer looked for the Claimant
for approximately twenty minutes in order to assign him to the work. Thereafter,
Guyer twice had Claimant paged. Guyer informed his superiors that he could not
find the Claimant. Subsequently, General Foreman Reeser located the Claimant in
the cabin of Locomotive 6159, which was on the west 5 track. The Claimant's
assigned work was on the cabin track, a distance of some fifty yards from where
he was found. Reeser motioned to Foreman Guyer and Shop Superintendent Stayer
to come aver to the engine. All three stood outside the cab and heard the
Claimant snoring. After a couple of minutes, they entered the cab and observed
Claimant snoring. He awoke at 1:55 A.M.
The organization argues that, on the night in question, there was insufficient
work at the cabin track. By sitting in Locomotive 6159, Claimant-thereby positioned
himself in an area where he could see the cabin track and perform'any duties
should they arise. While it is factual there was insufficient work on the cabin
track, we agree with Carrier's conclusion that Claimant's explanation for his
presence in the locomotive cab is self serving. The Claimant was fifty yards
distance from his job assigrm~ent, an area clearly outside his work area. His
testimonial admissions are a tacit acknowledgement of loitering. The substantial
weight of evidence supports the Carrier finding that the record established
Claimant was sleeping.
On two prior occasions, this Claimant received discipline for assuming an
attitude of sleep while on duty. Carrier contends this prior discipline has not
had a corrective impact. We agree and note the record clearly established
Claimant believed he was justified in being away from his assigned area because,
he had no immediate work assignment. This Board is bound by the evidence
presented. A review thereof affirms Carrier properly concluded Claimant was out
of assigned work area, loitering, and sleeping the morning of August 20, 1979.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Second Division
Attest: Acting Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board
J
semarie Brasch - Administrative Assistant
Date at Chicago, Illinois, this 21st day of April, 1982.