Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 9036
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 9091
2-SPT-EW-'82
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Kay McMurray when award was rendered.
( International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
Parties to Dispute:
( Southern Pacific Transportation Company

Dispute: Claim of Employes;












Findings:

The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.



Claimant, Mr. Tyler, was notified by certified mail dated June 5, 1979 to appear for an investigation on June 18, 1979. The purpose of the hearing as outlined in the letter read:






The investigation was held as scheduled and following that hearing the penalty herein complained of was assessed. After a careful review of the
Form 1 Award No. 9036
Page 2 Docket No. 9091
2-SPT-EW-'82

transcript we find that the hearing was conducted in accordance with contractual requirements and past practice.

The record reveals that Mr. Tyler was in fact absent from work on the days under consideration and the Carrier received no word regarding the reasons for his absence. Claimant's actions constitute a clear violation of the rules as charged.

The gravamen of the Organization's defense resides in its view that the hearing was unfair because Mr. Tyler was not present to give his side of the story. The record contains a receipt signed by a Karma Tyler signifying that the notice of investigation was received at his last known address. He was given sufficient time to appear if he so desired. Claimant cannot frustrate the processes of the contract by refusing to appear at an investigation. He was represented by the Organization and the contractual commitments wdre fulfilled.

It should be noted that the record reveals that claimant had been absent from work since May 30, 1978. Several attempts by the Carrier to contact him to determine the reason for his absence were ineffective. The Organization made some attempt to locate Mr. Tyler with the same result.

In view of the foregoing and the entire record we find that claimant was guilty as charged. Further, there is nothing in the record which would warrant a more lenient penalty.






                            By Order of Second Division


Attest: Acting Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board

B y
      semarie Brasch - Administrative Assistant


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 21st day of April, 1982.