Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No.
9036
SECOND DIVISION Docket No.
9091
2-SPT-EW-'82
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Kay McMurray when award was rendered.
( International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
Parties to Dispute:
( Southern Pacific Transportation Company
Dispute: Claim of Employes;
1. That under the current Agreement, Mechanical Department Electrician
R. G. Tyler was unjustly treated when he was dismissed from service on
June
26, 1979,
following investigation for alleged violation of portion
of Rule 810 of the General Rules and Regulations of the Southern Pacific
Transportation Company (Pacific Lines). Said violation occurring from
May 24, through June
5, 1979. '.
2 That accordingly, the Southern Pacific Transportation Company (Pacific:
Lines), be ordered to:
(a) Restore Electrician R. G. Tyler to service with all rights
unimpaired including service and seniority, loss of wages, vacation,
payment of hospital and medical insurance, group disability
insurance, railroad retirement contributions, and loss of wages
including interest at the rate of six percent
(6%)
per annum.
Findings:
The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all
the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute
are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act
as approved June 21,
1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute
involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing thereon.
Claimant, Mr. Tyler, was notified by certified mail dated June
5, 1979
to
appear for an investigation on June 18,
1979.
The purpose of the hearing as
outlined in the letter read:
"...
your alleged continued failure to protect your employment
on May 24,
1979,
through June
5, 1979,
which may involve
violation of Rule 810 of the General Rules and Regulations,
that part reading:
Rule 810: Continued failure by employes to protect their
employment shall be sufficient cause for dismissal."
The investigation was held as scheduled and following that hearing the
penalty herein complained of was assessed. After a careful review of the
Form 1 Award No. 9036
Page 2 Docket No. 9091
2-SPT-EW-'82
transcript we find that the hearing was conducted in accordance with contractual
requirements and past practice.
The record reveals that Mr. Tyler was in fact absent from work on the days
under consideration and the Carrier received no word regarding the reasons for
his absence. Claimant's actions constitute a clear violation of the rules as
charged.
The gravamen of the Organization's defense resides in its view that the
hearing was unfair because Mr. Tyler was not present to give his side of the
story. The record contains a receipt signed by a Karma Tyler signifying that the
notice of investigation was received at his last known address. He was given
sufficient time to appear if he so desired. Claimant cannot frustrate the
processes of the contract by refusing to appear at an investigation. He was
represented by the Organization and the contractual commitments wdre fulfilled.
It should be noted that the record reveals that claimant had been absent
from work since May 30, 1978. Several attempts by the Carrier to contact him to
determine the reason for his absence were ineffective. The Organization made
some attempt to locate Mr. Tyler with the same result.
In view of the foregoing and the entire record we find that claimant was
guilty as charged. Further, there is nothing in the record which would warrant
a more lenient penalty.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Second Division
Attest: Acting Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board
B
y
semarie Brasch - Administrative Assistant
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 21st day of April, 1982.