Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 9146
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 9355-T
2-MP-CM-'82
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee John B. LaRocco when award was rendered.
( Brotherhood Railway Carmen of the United States
Parties to Dispute: ~ and Canada
( Missouri Pacific Railroad Company
Dispute: Claim of Employes:
1. That the Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, January
g, 1930,
violated
Rule 117 of the controlling Agreement when other than those of the
Carmen's Craft were used to repair freight car LOVX 7235,.while this
car was within the yard limit and seniority area of the Carmen in
Kansas City, Missouri.
2. That the Missouri Pacific Railroad Company be ordered to compensate
Cayman G. J. Schaetz in the amount of two (2) and seven-tenths
(.7)
hours at the pro rata rate for this violation.
Findings
The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all
the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute,
are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act
as approved June 21, 193+.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute
involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing thereon.
On January
g,
1980, the Carrier instructed Cayman Malaponti to proceed
from the Maintenance of Equipment Department to Park Avenue to replace a knuckle
and pin a switch crew had reported missing from car LOVX 7235. When he arrived
at Park Avenue, Carman Malaponti discovered that two switchmen had already
replaced the knuckle and pin. The Carrier did not direct the switchmen to
perform the work. Claimant is another carman stationed at the Carrier's
Kansas City Maintenance of Equipment facility.
Claimant seeks two and seven tenths hours of pay at the straight time
rate based on the Carrier's alleged misassignment of work. According to the
Organization, work consisting of the replacement of knuckles and pins is
exclusively reserved to the Carmen's craft pursuant to Rule 117. On the other
hand, the Carrier maintains that Carmen do not have exclusive rights to perform
the disputed work either by the express terms of Rule
117
or by historical
practice. Also, the Carrier argues there was, in reality, no improper
assignment of work since the Carrier directed a carman to go to Park Avenue
and perform the work.
Form 1 Award No. 9146
Page 2 Docket No.
9355-T
2-MP-CM-'82
In this case, we need not address the applicability of Rule
117
because
the Carrier did instruct a carman to replace the knuckle and pin. The Cayman
who was so instructed was paid for his round trip travel time between the
Maintenance of Equipment Shop and Park Avenue. From the record, it appears the
switching crew unilaterally decided to perform the work before the Cayman's
arrival merely to expedite the movement of car LOVX
7235·
Thus, we find
insufficient evidence that the Carrier misassigned the disputed work.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Second Division
Attest: Acting Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board
l
By ~~-
s arie Brasch - Administrative Assistant
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 16th day of June, 1982