Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJTJST14ENT BOARD Award No. 9155
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 9024-T
2-TP&W-EW-'82
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Rodney E. Dennis when award was rendered.
( International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
Parties to Dispute:
( Toledo, Peoria and Western Railway Company

Dispute: Claim of Employes:





Findings:

The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.



On March 9, 1980 a Machinist carried a portable radio and placed it in the cab of a locomotive. Electrician R. E. Burk filed a claim alleging that Carrier assigned Electrician's work to a Machinist in violation of the Rule 99 classification of Electricians and Memorandum of Agreement No. 2. The Organization contends that the Rule and the Memorandum clearly state that the installation and maintenance of radio equipment belong to it. Consequently, a four-hour straight time claim is payable to Claimant.

Carrier argues that it did not violate Rule 99 or Agreement No. 2, since no installation work took place. The radio was just carried by the Machinist and placed in the cab. The whole operation only took five minutes.

The record of this case reveals that the work performed in this instance was by all standards de minimus. As such, it does not constitute a scope violation that would warrant a four-hour claim be paid. See Second Division Awards 7587 (Eischen) and 7529 (Scearce).
Form 1
Page 2

A W A R D

Claim denied.

Attest: Acting Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board

By


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 30th day of June, 1982.

Award No. 9155
Docket No. 9024-T
2-TP&W-EW-'82

NATIONAL. RAIIROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Second Division

NNW