Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUST BOARD Award No. 9256
SECOND DIVISION Docket No.
8708
2-MP-EW-' 82
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Martin F. Scheinnan when award was rendered.
( International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
Parties to Dispute:
( Missouri Pacific Railroad Company
Dispute: Claim of Employes:
1. That the Missouri Pacific Railroad Company violated Rules 1
and 24 (a) of the Communications Agreement effective August 1,
1977;
Memorandum of August 12,
1960.d; and, Article
III
of the September
25, 1964
Agreement when they assigned
Electrician S. D. Vanderlinden to perform Communications
Maintainers' work, thus, denying Communications Maintainer
G. Spielbush at Kansas City, Missouri his contractual rights
under the Agreements and his rights in the division of work
under the Memorandum of December 1,
1978.
2. That, accordingly, the Missouri Pacific Railroad Company be
ordered to compensate Communications Maintainer G. Spielbush two
and seven-tenths hours (2.7') at the overtime rate for
December 1,
1978.
Findings:
The Second Division of the
Adjustment
Board, upon the whole record and
all the evidence, finds that
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this
dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway
Labor Act as approved June 21,
1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdication over the dispute
involved
herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing thereon.
The
Organization contends that Carrier violated Rule 1, Scope, and Rule
24,
Seniority, when it instructed electrician S. D. Vanderlinden to remove the
radio hand set from MP Unit
2043
and install hand set on MP Unit
1951
on December
1,
1978.
It also asserts that Carrier's action violated a Memorandum between the
parties dated August 12,
1960.
Claimant, Glen Speilbush is a Communication Maintainer assigned to the
Carrier's Kansas City Terminal Division.
This identical case, between these same parties and the sane Claimant,
was decided in Award No. 9254. There, we determined that Carrier's action in
assigning an electrician to remove and install the radio hand set violated the
Agreement Unless Carrier demonstrated that it was due to an emergency situation.
Form 1 Award No. 9256
Page 2 Docket No.
8708
2-MP-Fed-' 82
Here, Carrier has failed to meet its burden of establishing an emergency situation.
Therefore, we must conclude, consistent with our earlier decisions,
that Carrier's action violated the Agreement. However, consistent with our
reasoning set forth in Award No.9254, we must conclude that no compensation is due
to Claimant.
The Agreement was violated.
A W A R D
Claim sustained to the extent indicated in Findings.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Second Division
Attest: Acting Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board
By ,_ _ _ ~_v
marie Brasch - Administrative Assistant
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 28th day of
July,
1982.