Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 9301
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 8959
2-CR-FO-182
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee John J. Mikrut, Jr. when award was rendered.
( International Brotherhood of Firemen and Oilers
Parties to Dispute:
( Consolidated Rail Corporation

Dispute: Claim of Employes:





Findings:

The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 193+.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.



Claimant, a Laborer with seniority date of December 20, 1977, at Carrier's Stanley Diesel Terminal, Toledo, Ohio, was charged with "(V)iolation of Rule 4002 of the Maintenance of Equipment Safety Rules in that you were observed smoking marijuana in Stanley Diesel Terminal at approximately 9:25 P.m. on June 26, 197c3, while you were on duty and under pay ..." Pursuant to an investigatory hearing which was held on July 11, 1979, Claimant was adjudged guilty as charged and was terminated from Carrier's service. Said termination is the basis of this claim_

The instant case is the companion to Award No. 9300 which was decided by the Board previously and which involved the dismissal of laborer T. Apel for charges that were exactly the same as those cited hereinabove. Though said cases involve the same incident, their respective claims have been filed and argued separately. With the sole exception that Mr. Apel appeared as a witness and testified on behalf of Claimant in the instant case (although said testimony is deemed by the Board not to have been significant), the same factual circumstances
Form 1 Page 2

Award No. 9301
Docket No. 8959
2-CR-FO-'82

are operative in both cases and the same basic arguments have been proffered by the parties in support of their respective cases. Insofar as the Board can see no appreciable differences whatsoever between the two cases, the same rationale and logic which was developed in Award No. 9300 will also be applied in the instant case thus necessitating the rendering of exactly the same award as was rendered therein.

A W A R D

Claim denied.

Attest: Acting Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board

NATIONAL RAIIROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD

By Order of Second Division


;emarie Brasch - Administrative Assistant

Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 22nd day of September, 1982.